-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for JSX fragment syntax #19249
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
abb3f58
Add support for JSX fragment syntax
uniqueiniquity 269d37a
Update tests
uniqueiniquity 5f8a1b5
Add baselines
uniqueiniquity 845f573
Update API baselines
uniqueiniquity 7566529
Respond to CR
uniqueiniquity a7f9ec0
Respond to CR
uniqueiniquity fb05886
Respond to CR
uniqueiniquity 961495b
Remove unnecessary type annotation
uniqueiniquity 5dd1a47
Error when using fragment with jsxFactory
uniqueiniquity a83ec41
Added test for preventing fragment with jsxFactory
uniqueiniquity 3ebb2e8
Merge branch 'master' into jsxFragment
uniqueiniquity File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this perhaps be customizable, similar to how
--jsxFactory
is? e.g.--jsxFragmentComponent
?Arguably not useful for anything but React and React clones, though; as other less similar frameworks would want to do other special processing on fragments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with your second point here; to take the example of Mithril, the framework supports fragments, but with a completely different approach than React will (i.e.
m.fragment(attrs, children)
) so it's not as convenient as simply replacing the call tocreateElement
with--jsxFactory
. It seems to make sense in this case to just preserve the JSX syntax as is for non-React libs and have each define their own transpilation depending on their implementation of fragments.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Kovensky do you know what babel will do here? would it support another version of the paragma for the
React.createElement
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
checked with @hzoo over slack and does not seem that babel have plans for this in the immediate term.
I wounder if we should just make it an error to use Fragment +
--jsx React
+--jsxNamespace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@uniqueiniquity can you file an issue for adding the error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I think I see now. I'm confusing
jsxFactory
andreactNamespace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So are you on board with issuing the error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably, but feel free not to block this PR on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the PR to issue an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the Babel PR, I add a pragma for fragments, as @mhegazy suggested. https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/6552/files#diff-7e5b807d66ce513f501563ad8f8d03e6R117
https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/6552/files#diff-7e5b807d66ce513f501563ad8f8d03e6R89