-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix narrowing union with union type predicate #31206
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
68 changes: 68 additions & 0 deletions
68
tests/baselines/reference/typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ | ||
//// [typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts] | ||
declare let a: string | undefined; | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a: string | undefined): a is "" | undefined; | ||
if (isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a)) { | ||
a; // "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrFoo(a: any): a is "" | "foo"; | ||
if (isEmptyStringOrFoo(a)) { | ||
a; // "" | "foo" | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isNumberOrBoolean(a: any): a is number | boolean; | ||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(a)) { | ||
a; // never | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let b: "" | undefined; | ||
|
||
declare function isStringOrUndefined(b: any): b is string | undefined; | ||
if (isStringOrUndefined(b)) { | ||
b; // "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(b)) { | ||
b; // never | ||
} | ||
|
||
type A = { a: unknown }; | ||
type B = { b: unknown }; | ||
declare let c: { a: string } | { z: number }; | ||
|
||
declare function isAorB(c: any): c is A | B; | ||
if (isAorB(c)) { | ||
c; // { a: string } | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let d: A | B; | ||
|
||
declare function hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d: any): d is { a: string } | B | undefined; | ||
if (hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d)) { | ||
d; // { a: string } | B | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
//// [typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.js] | ||
if (isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a)) { | ||
a; // "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
if (isEmptyStringOrFoo(a)) { | ||
a; // "" | "foo" | ||
} | ||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(a)) { | ||
a; // never | ||
} | ||
if (isStringOrUndefined(b)) { | ||
b; // "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(b)) { | ||
b; // never | ||
} | ||
if (isAorB(c)) { | ||
c; // { a: string } | ||
} | ||
if (hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d)) { | ||
d; // { a: string } | B | ||
} |
115 changes: 115 additions & 0 deletions
115
tests/baselines/reference/typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.symbols
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ | ||
=== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts === | ||
declare let a: string | undefined; | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a: string | undefined): a is "" | undefined; | ||
>isEmptyStringOrUndefined : Symbol(isEmptyStringOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 34)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 2, 42)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 2, 42)) | ||
|
||
if (isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a)) { | ||
>isEmptyStringOrUndefined : Symbol(isEmptyStringOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 34)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
|
||
a; // "" | undefined | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrFoo(a: any): a is "" | "foo"; | ||
>isEmptyStringOrFoo : Symbol(isEmptyStringOrFoo, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 5, 1)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 7, 36)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 7, 36)) | ||
|
||
if (isEmptyStringOrFoo(a)) { | ||
>isEmptyStringOrFoo : Symbol(isEmptyStringOrFoo, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 5, 1)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
|
||
a; // "" | "foo" | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isNumberOrBoolean(a: any): a is number | boolean; | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : Symbol(isNumberOrBoolean, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 10, 1)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 12, 35)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 12, 35)) | ||
|
||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(a)) { | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : Symbol(isNumberOrBoolean, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 10, 1)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
|
||
a; // never | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 0, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let b: "" | undefined; | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 11)) | ||
|
||
declare function isStringOrUndefined(b: any): b is string | undefined; | ||
>isStringOrUndefined : Symbol(isStringOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 30)) | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 19, 37)) | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 19, 37)) | ||
|
||
if (isStringOrUndefined(b)) { | ||
>isStringOrUndefined : Symbol(isStringOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 30)) | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 11)) | ||
|
||
b; // "" | undefined | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(b)) { | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : Symbol(isNumberOrBoolean, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 10, 1)) | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 11)) | ||
|
||
b; // never | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 17, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
type A = { a: unknown }; | ||
>A : Symbol(A, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 26, 1)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 28, 10)) | ||
|
||
type B = { b: unknown }; | ||
>B : Symbol(B, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 28, 24)) | ||
>b : Symbol(b, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 29, 10)) | ||
|
||
declare let c: { a: string } | { z: number }; | ||
>c : Symbol(c, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 11)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 16)) | ||
>z : Symbol(z, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 32)) | ||
|
||
declare function isAorB(c: any): c is A | B; | ||
>isAorB : Symbol(isAorB, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 45)) | ||
>c : Symbol(c, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 32, 24)) | ||
>c : Symbol(c, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 32, 24)) | ||
>A : Symbol(A, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 26, 1)) | ||
>B : Symbol(B, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 28, 24)) | ||
|
||
if (isAorB(c)) { | ||
>isAorB : Symbol(isAorB, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 45)) | ||
>c : Symbol(c, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 11)) | ||
|
||
c; // { a: string } | ||
>c : Symbol(c, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 30, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let d: A | B; | ||
>d : Symbol(d, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 37, 11)) | ||
>A : Symbol(A, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 26, 1)) | ||
>B : Symbol(B, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 28, 24)) | ||
|
||
declare function hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d: any): d is { a: string } | B | undefined; | ||
>hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined : Symbol(hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 37, 21)) | ||
>d : Symbol(d, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 39, 52)) | ||
>d : Symbol(d, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 39, 52)) | ||
>a : Symbol(a, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 39, 67)) | ||
>B : Symbol(B, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 28, 24)) | ||
|
||
if (hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d)) { | ||
>hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined : Symbol(hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 37, 21)) | ||
>d : Symbol(d, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 37, 11)) | ||
|
||
d; // { a: string } | B | ||
>d : Symbol(d, Decl(typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts, 37, 11)) | ||
} | ||
|
111 changes: 111 additions & 0 deletions
111
tests/baselines/reference/typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.types
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ | ||
=== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardNarrowsEmptyStringOrUndefinedUnion.ts === | ||
declare let a: string | undefined; | ||
>a : string | undefined | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a: string | undefined): a is "" | undefined; | ||
>isEmptyStringOrUndefined : (a: string | undefined) => a is "" | undefined | ||
>a : string | undefined | ||
|
||
if (isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a)) { | ||
>isEmptyStringOrUndefined(a) : boolean | ||
>isEmptyStringOrUndefined : (a: string | undefined) => a is "" | undefined | ||
>a : string | undefined | ||
|
||
a; // "" | undefined | ||
>a : "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isEmptyStringOrFoo(a: any): a is "" | "foo"; | ||
>isEmptyStringOrFoo : (a: any) => a is "" | "foo" | ||
>a : any | ||
|
||
if (isEmptyStringOrFoo(a)) { | ||
>isEmptyStringOrFoo(a) : boolean | ||
>isEmptyStringOrFoo : (a: any) => a is "" | "foo" | ||
>a : string | undefined | ||
|
||
a; // "" | "foo" | ||
>a : "" | "foo" | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare function isNumberOrBoolean(a: any): a is number | boolean; | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : (a: any) => a is number | boolean | ||
>a : any | ||
|
||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(a)) { | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean(a) : boolean | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : (a: any) => a is number | boolean | ||
>a : string | undefined | ||
|
||
a; // never | ||
>a : never | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let b: "" | undefined; | ||
>b : "" | undefined | ||
|
||
declare function isStringOrUndefined(b: any): b is string | undefined; | ||
>isStringOrUndefined : (b: any) => b is string | undefined | ||
>b : any | ||
|
||
if (isStringOrUndefined(b)) { | ||
>isStringOrUndefined(b) : boolean | ||
>isStringOrUndefined : (b: any) => b is string | undefined | ||
>b : "" | undefined | ||
|
||
b; // "" | undefined | ||
>b : "" | undefined | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (isNumberOrBoolean(b)) { | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean(b) : boolean | ||
>isNumberOrBoolean : (a: any) => a is number | boolean | ||
>b : "" | undefined | ||
|
||
b; // never | ||
>b : never | ||
} | ||
|
||
type A = { a: unknown }; | ||
>A : A | ||
>a : unknown | ||
|
||
type B = { b: unknown }; | ||
>B : B | ||
>b : unknown | ||
|
||
declare let c: { a: string } | { z: number }; | ||
>c : { a: string; } | { z: number; } | ||
>a : string | ||
>z : number | ||
|
||
declare function isAorB(c: any): c is A | B; | ||
>isAorB : (c: any) => c is A | B | ||
>c : any | ||
|
||
if (isAorB(c)) { | ||
>isAorB(c) : boolean | ||
>isAorB : (c: any) => c is A | B | ||
>c : { a: string; } | { z: number; } | ||
|
||
c; // { a: string } | ||
>c : { a: string; } | ||
} | ||
|
||
declare let d: A | B; | ||
>d : A | B | ||
|
||
declare function hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d: any): d is { a: string } | B | undefined; | ||
>hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined : (d: any) => d is B | { a: string; } | undefined | ||
>d : any | ||
>a : string | ||
|
||
if (hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d)) { | ||
>hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined(d) : boolean | ||
>hasStringPropertyAOrIsBOrUndefined : (d: any) => d is B | { a: string; } | undefined | ||
>d : A | B | ||
|
||
d; // { a: string } | B | ||
>d : B | { a: string; } | ||
} | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not define it recursively?:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what I tried first, but the intersection logic at the end screws up the computation for object types. If two constituents are entirely not related, we want to drop them out of the union, not include their intersection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah... I see that's technically correct, but we have several baselines that expect unrelated constituents to be discarded. From
partiallyDiscriminatedUnions.ts
:And there's nothing technically incorrect about that, but it's definitively grosser, and we've been rolling with the current behavior for 3 years and nobody has complained.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The above example I wrote behaves as I described today, though (you can put it in the playground and it yields exactly that type). And the "unrelated variants are discarded" shtick is mostly limited solely to discriminable variants (excepting
in
narrowing, which we know is unsafe) - types whose member types guarantee that membership to one or the other is mutually exclusive.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about the Shape example then? Technically
Circle
andShape[]
aren't discriminable because I can define an object that conforms to both, but in practice it seems pretty unlikely.There are a few other baselines that fail in the same vein, and it's even more painful when the result is an intersection between a primitive literal type and some type of object:
I can suspend my disbelief that I might have an object that is simultaneously a
Circle
andShape[]
, but"a" & S[]
? 🤨It feels like there must be a case for using heuristics to simplify the results when a user is explicitly narrowing something. Otherwise, this function would just return the intersection no matter what, wouldn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Intersections don't actually do supertrype reduction, so we'd still be testing to see if one side is the supertype of another and simplifying to the supertype.
But pretty much, yeah.
Counterexample, we have branded literals:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, of course you're still right. It just feels bad 😄
I'm not sure what I would really propose here. I think most of these results appear really unintuitive, but I guess they don’t stop you from using the variable the way you would before.
And it catches an actual bug bug. Wow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated to this approach. You can see the handful of baselines change that look like these examples.