Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow functions and ambient classes to merge #32584
Allow functions and ambient classes to merge #32584
Changes from all commits
0cd031e
718fb73
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so an ambient class sets SymbolFlags.Value too? I assume that's why we have to check
p.valueDeclaration
now, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ambient classes do, in fact, count as values, since they do, in fact, resolve in an expression. A declaration being ambient just means it's missing a body - doesn't change its meaning in any other way, really.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(The value without a value declaration thing shouldn't happen anymore - it's what caused me to do the "Assignment no longer implies Type or Value" in the other PR for
@enum
I merged last week. The reason I had to add this was because I had a namespace with no value declaration due to an assignment-caused namespace in a test, IIRC.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it sounds like you can revert if it you want, or keep it for future safety. Either way is fine with me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rather keep it - I always feel assuming
valueDeclaration
exists is sketchy anyway, and there's minimal overhead to checking it here.This file was deleted.