-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the specialcase intended for strictNullChecks: false
in Awaited
#52949
Remove the specialcase intended for strictNullChecks: false
in Awaited
#52949
Conversation
This PR doesn't have any linked issues. Please open an issue that references this PR. From there we can discuss and prioritise. |
Maybe this will help, not sure: @typescript-bot test this |
Heya @RyanCavanaugh, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 7e8f046. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @RyanCavanaugh, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 7e8f046. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @RyanCavanaugh, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 7e8f046. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @RyanCavanaugh, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 7e8f046. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Not sure if our benchmarks use it but it's less work to do while checking so maybe... @typescript-bot perf test this |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 7e8f046. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@RyanCavanaugh Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing Everything looks good! |
@jakebailey Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - main..52949
System
Hosts
Scenarios
TSServerComparison Report - main..52949
System
Hosts
Scenarios
StartupComparison Report - main..52949
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@RyanCavanaugh Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
This exists because the result for |
This seems to be the case. We need to add a test for both |
#52960 adds the missing tests. I have also verified that they do report a baseline change if the |
A colleague of mine asked me why this branch is needed here. I couldn't figure it out so I decided to run the TS test suite without this to learn more about it... but the whole thing just passed.
There are two possible situations here:
If it's the second situation - then I would appreciate if somebody could provide that test case so I could add it, cause I don't know what that would look like.
This type was added here with this special branch there, right from the start. cc @rbuckton