BuildInfo refactoring: Now that we dont have bundle we dont need program field explicitly #58789
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typescript-bot
added
Author: Team
For Uncommitted Bug
sheetalkamat
force-pushed
the
noBundleRefactor
branch
from
1eb69c5 to
36986bb
Compare
…ram field explicitly. Saves some bytes
sheetalkamat
force-pushed
the
noBundleRefactor
branch
from
36986bb to
1732907
Compare
jakebailey
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Saves some bytes
Plus makes the buildInfo for nonIncremental with
tsc -bthats coming up easier.