Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore GraphingImplOverrides.props. #472

Conversation

danbelcher-MSFT
Copy link

Description of the changes:

Update the .gitignore to ignore GraphingImplOverrides.props.

This update already exists in the feature branch but we can merge it to master now to make development of the feature easier and prevent accidentally commiting this file.

How changes were validated:

Manual.

  • Switch to feature branch. Add GraphingImplOverrides.props
  • Switch to dabelc/IgnoreGraphingImplOverrides.props. Confirm git shows no files changed but props file is present.

This update already exists in the feature branch but we can merge it to master now to make development of the feature easier and prevent accidentally commiting this file.
@danbelcher-MSFT danbelcher-MSFT merged commit 861d4ef into microsoft:master Apr 23, 2019
@danbelcher-MSFT danbelcher-MSFT deleted the dabelc/IgnoreGraphingImplOverrides branch April 26, 2019 00:48
EriWong pushed a commit to EriWong/calculator that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2019
…ft#472)

Description of the changes:
Update the .gitignore to ignore GraphingImplOverrides.props.

This update already exists in the feature branch but we can merge it to master now to make development of the feature easier and prevent accidentally commiting this file.

How changes were validated:
Manual.

Switch to feature branch. Add GraphingImplOverrides.props
Switch to dabelc/IgnoreGraphingImplOverrides.props. Confirm git shows no files changed but props file is present.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants