Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Graduate pipreport #1219

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Graduate pipreport #1219

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

pauld-msft
Copy link
Member

Another shot at graduating pip report to non-experimental. First pr: #1199

@pauld-msft pauld-msft requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2024 16:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.4%. Comparing base (80146ce) to head (4191882).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #1219     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   76.4%   76.4%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        259     258      -1     
  Lines      11655   11650      -5     
  Branches    1175    1175             
=======================================
- Hits        8910    8905      -5     
  Misses      2406    2406             
  Partials     339     339             

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pauld-msft pauld-msft merged commit 3d161b0 into main Aug 6, 2024
23 of 26 checks passed
@pauld-msft pauld-msft deleted the pauldorsch/graduate-pipreport-again branch August 6, 2024 20:44
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

  • The detector detects more or fewer components than before
  • The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
  • The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants