This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 5, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this is determined by a user option:
UserPreferences.displayPartsForJSDoc
So I think this is close, but it could be either a string or the array and so we probably want to handle that as a separate if?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pushed a change to accomodate for that. Where does the discrepancy in
typescriptServices.d.ts
come from though? I don't see thestring
option thereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, this is likely a bug in the compiler codebase - there are a few types which end up repeated in services vs the compiler. For this example,
typescriptServices.d.ts
has both:It compiles fine because of interface merging - I'll make a PR which makes them consistent to the compiler and see what someone closer to the codebase thinks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that makes sense. Thank you for the fast review on this PR!