Add CharEncoding test to the MuBuild #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
os-d
pushed a commit
to os-d/mu_basecore
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2024
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541 REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1948.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6528.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt Bug Overview: PixieFail Bug microsoft#8 CVE-2023-45236 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor Updates TCP ISN generation to use a cryptographic hash of the connection's identifying parameters and a secret key. This prevents an attacker from guessing the ISN used for some other connection. This is follows the guidance in RFC 1948, RFC 6528, and RFC 9293. RFC: 9293 Section 3.4.1. Initial Sequence Number Selection A TCP implementation MUST use the above type of "clock" for clock- driven selection of initial sequence numbers (MUST-8), and SHOULD generate its initial sequence numbers with the expression: ISN = M + F(localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport, secretkey) where M is the 4 microsecond timer, and F() is a pseudorandom function (PRF) of the connection's identifying parameters ("localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport") and a secret key ("secretkey") (SHLD-1). F() MUST NOT be computable from the outside (MUST-9), or an attacker could still guess at sequence numbers from the ISN used for some other connection. The PRF could be implemented as a cryptographic hash of the concatenation of the TCP connection parameters and some secret data. For discussion of the selection of a specific hash algorithm and management of the secret key data, please see Section 3 of [42]. For each connection there is a send sequence number and a receive sequence number. The initial send sequence number (ISS) is chosen by the data sending TCP peer, and the initial receive sequence number (IRS) is learned during the connection-establishing procedure. For a connection to be established or initialized, the two TCP peers must synchronize on each other's initial sequence numbers. This is done in an exchange of connection-establishing segments carrying a control bit called "SYN" (for synchronize) and the initial sequence numbers. As a shorthand, segments carrying the SYN bit are also called "SYNs". Hence, the solution requires a suitable mechanism for picking an initial sequence number and a slightly involved handshake to exchange the ISNs. Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <zachary.clark-williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <doug.edk2@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com>
Flickdm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541 REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1948.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6528.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt Bug Overview: PixieFail Bug #8 CVE-2023-45236 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor Updates TCP ISN generation to use a cryptographic hash of the connection's identifying parameters and a secret key. This prevents an attacker from guessing the ISN used for some other connection. This is follows the guidance in RFC 1948, RFC 6528, and RFC 9293. RFC: 9293 Section 3.4.1. Initial Sequence Number Selection A TCP implementation MUST use the above type of "clock" for clock- driven selection of initial sequence numbers (MUST-8), and SHOULD generate its initial sequence numbers with the expression: ISN = M + F(localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport, secretkey) where M is the 4 microsecond timer, and F() is a pseudorandom function (PRF) of the connection's identifying parameters ("localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport") and a secret key ("secretkey") (SHLD-1). F() MUST NOT be computable from the outside (MUST-9), or an attacker could still guess at sequence numbers from the ISN used for some other connection. The PRF could be implemented as a cryptographic hash of the concatenation of the TCP connection parameters and some secret data. For discussion of the selection of a specific hash algorithm and management of the secret key data, please see Section 3 of [42]. For each connection there is a send sequence number and a receive sequence number. The initial send sequence number (ISS) is chosen by the data sending TCP peer, and the initial receive sequence number (IRS) is learned during the connection-establishing procedure. For a connection to be established or initialized, the two TCP peers must synchronize on each other's initial sequence numbers. This is done in an exchange of connection-establishing segments carrying a control bit called "SYN" (for synchronize) and the initial sequence numbers. As a shorthand, segments carrying the SYN bit are also called "SYNs". Hence, the solution requires a suitable mechanism for picking an initial sequence number and a slightly involved handshake to exchange the ISNs. Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <zachary.clark-williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <doug.edk2@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com>
Flickdm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541 REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1948.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6528.txt REF: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.txt Bug Overview: PixieFail Bug #8 CVE-2023-45236 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor Updates TCP ISN generation to use a cryptographic hash of the connection's identifying parameters and a secret key. This prevents an attacker from guessing the ISN used for some other connection. This is follows the guidance in RFC 1948, RFC 6528, and RFC 9293. RFC: 9293 Section 3.4.1. Initial Sequence Number Selection A TCP implementation MUST use the above type of "clock" for clock- driven selection of initial sequence numbers (MUST-8), and SHOULD generate its initial sequence numbers with the expression: ISN = M + F(localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport, secretkey) where M is the 4 microsecond timer, and F() is a pseudorandom function (PRF) of the connection's identifying parameters ("localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport") and a secret key ("secretkey") (SHLD-1). F() MUST NOT be computable from the outside (MUST-9), or an attacker could still guess at sequence numbers from the ISN used for some other connection. The PRF could be implemented as a cryptographic hash of the concatenation of the TCP connection parameters and some secret data. For discussion of the selection of a specific hash algorithm and management of the secret key data, please see Section 3 of [42]. For each connection there is a send sequence number and a receive sequence number. The initial send sequence number (ISS) is chosen by the data sending TCP peer, and the initial receive sequence number (IRS) is learned during the connection-establishing procedure. For a connection to be established or initialized, the two TCP peers must synchronize on each other's initial sequence numbers. This is done in an exchange of connection-establishing segments carrying a control bit called "SYN" (for synchronize) and the initial sequence numbers. As a shorthand, segments carrying the SYN bit are also called "SYNs". Hence, the solution requires a suitable mechanism for picking an initial sequence number and a slightly involved handshake to exchange the ISNs. Cc: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com> Cc: Zachary Clark-williams <zachary.clark-williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Doug Flick [MSFT] <doug.edk2@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Saloni Kasbekar <saloni.kasbekar@intel.com>
vineelko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
## Description Format only. Formatting changes from running with nightly rustfmt to fully apply all rules specified in `rustfmt.toml`. No functional changes. - [ ] Impacts functionality? - [ ] Impacts security? - [ ] Breaking change? - [ ] Includes tests? - [ ] Includes documentation? ## How This Was Tested No functional change. ## Integration Instructions N/A
apop5
pushed a commit
to apop5/mu_basecore
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2025
This patch does not impact functionality. It aims to clarify the synchronization flow between the BSP and APs to enhance code readability and understanding: Steps microsoft#6 and microsoft#11 are the basic synchronization requirements for all cases. Steps microsoft#1 is additional requirements if the MmCpuSyncModeTradition mode is selected. Steps microsoft#1, microsoft#2, microsoft#3, microsoft#4, microsoft#5, microsoft#7, microsoft#8, microsoft#9, and microsoft#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to configure the MTRR. Steps microsoft#9 and microsoft#10 are additional requirements if the system needs to support the mSmmDebugAgentSupport. Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Character encoding issues within files cause numerous build tools to fail. These result from copy & paste from other tools, editors, etc. This plugin will attempt to catch issues in a controlled method.