-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
Fix Missing Test Apps after Import-TestToolkitToBcContainer #3841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ChrisBlankDe
wants to merge
9
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
ChrisBlankDe:fix3729
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f50daec
Fix Missing Test Apps after Import-TestToolkitToBcContainer #3729
ChrisBlankDe 05f89dc
Merge branch 'main' into fix3729
freddydk fb80825
remove NoTransactions from Libraries
ChrisBlankDe b93eeb6
fix: ensure unique application files are returned in GetTestToolkitAp…
db25adf
Merge branch 'master' into fix3729
f93363a
Enhance app filtering in New-BcCompilerFolder to include additional t…
bd1fc83
Refine GetTestToolkitApps function to exclude specific test apps and …
50d5349
remove empty line
ChrisBlankDe 9877660
move entry in release notes
ChrisBlankDe File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It almost looks like it's easier just to explicitly list what to include and/or exclude.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i was not sure about this while implementing. i decide for this solution so we are not forced to change this when msft adds a new app. on the other side, it is not possible to see at a quick glance which apps are published
as pr description says this would have been simpler / nicer if msft had a consistent folder structure and naming pattern :/
we currently have around 82 test apps and 12 libraries
if you prefer to list all apps just say a word.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That we definitely agree on. But this is also not something we can change overnight.
Both explicitly listing the apps to include/exclude and matching the name with a patter have advantages and disadvantages.
I am more leaning towards the former as:
What do you think?