Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default to requiring tab to trigger a completion #310

Closed
billti opened this issue Jul 22, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

Default to requiring tab to trigger a completion #310

billti opened this issue Jul 22, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@billti
Copy link
Member

billti commented Jul 22, 2015

Intellisense is not always perfect, so it can be annoying when typing in a method name manually and it auto-selects a different one from the completion list.

Similar to other JavaScript editors, the default should be to accept what the user wrote, not a closest match from the list, unless an explicit completion trigger (i.e. TAB) is selected.

@mousetraps mousetraps modified the milestones: July, August Jul 24, 2015
@billti billti modified the milestones: September, August Aug 20, 2015
@mousetraps mousetraps self-assigned this Sep 13, 2015
mousetraps added a commit to mousetraps/nodejstools that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2015
Remove the custom committed-by characters setting and also default to
requiring tab/enter triggering a completion. This simplifies settings,
is consistent with both C# and JS projects in VS2015, and makes it easier
to work with identifiers that don't appear in the completions list.
mousetraps added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2015
#310 Default to requiring tab to trigger a completion
Remove the custom committed-by characters setting and also default to
requiring tab/enter triggering a completion. This simplifies settings,
is consistent with both C# and JS projects in VS2015, and makes it easier
to work with identifiers that don't appear in the completions list.

Fix #310, related to #179
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants