Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add multiclass classification test in raiwidgets #1576

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 23, 2022

Conversation

gaugup
Copy link
Contributor

@gaugup gaugup commented Jul 21, 2022

Description

It seems we don't test multiclass scenario in raiwidgets. It might be good to have as we add more end points for widgets flask server.

Checklist

  • I have added screenshots above for all UI changes.
  • I have added e2e tests for all UI changes.
  • Documentation was updated if it was needed.

Signed-off-by: Gaurav Gupta <gaugup@microsoft.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1576 (47d9104) into main (54179a0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1576   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.04%   88.04%           
=======================================
  Files         109      109           
  Lines        5295     5295           
=======================================
  Hits         4662     4662           
  Misses        633      633           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 54179a0...47d9104. Read the comment docs.

@gaugup gaugup enabled auto-merge (squash) July 22, 2022 23:23
@gaugup gaugup merged commit e3d0f24 into main Jul 23, 2022
@gaugup gaugup deleted the gaugup/AddMultiClassTestsRAIWidgets branch July 23, 2022 00:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants