Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PackfileMaintenanceStep: Use second-largest pack-size for batch size #375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2020
Merged

PackfileMaintenanceStep: Use second-largest pack-size for batch size #375

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2020

Commits on Jun 2, 2020

  1. PackfileMaintenanceStep: Use second-largest pack-size for batch size 

    When the total size of all pack-files is larger than 2 gigabytes, then
we currently use a strange mechanism for trying to repack everything
else into a single pack. It was recommended that we should use the
second-largest pack-file size instead.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
    @derrickstolee
    derrickstolee committed Jun 2, 2020
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    2339a87 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history