-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec for global action IDs #7175
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! :)
Urgh. This is going to conflict with #7141 (specifically the keybindings part). I think I'll definitely have to make WinRT-ify-ing the keybindings its own PR. I'm sure I'll be reaching out to you for help though so we'll have an idea of what's coming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes a lot of sense! I really like the whole ID
idea and being able to reference it elsewhere in settings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SHIP IT
In #6532, we thought it would be a good idea to add "bindings" as an overload for "keybindings", as we were no longer going to use the keybindings array for just keybindings. We were going to add commands. So we started secretly treating `"bindings"` the same as `"keybindings"`. Then, in #7175, we discussed using "actions" as the key for the list of commands/keybindings/global actions, instead of using "bindings". We're going to be using this array as the global list of all actions, so it makes sense to just call it `"actions"`. This PR renames "bindings" to "actions". Fortunately, we never documented the "bindings" overload in the first place, so we can get away with this safely, and preferably before we ship "bindings" for too long. References #6899
In #6532, we thought it would be a good idea to add "bindings" as an overload for "keybindings", as we were no longer going to use the keybindings array for just keybindings. We were going to add commands. So we started secretly treating `"bindings"` the same as `"keybindings"`. Then, in #7175, we discussed using "actions" as the key for the list of commands/keybindings/global actions, instead of using "bindings". We're going to be using this array as the global list of all actions, so it makes sense to just call it `"actions"`. This PR renames "bindings" to "actions". Fortunately, we never documented the "bindings" overload in the first place, so we can get away with this safely, and preferably before we ship "bindings" for too long. References #6899 (cherry picked from commit 2c4b868)
In microsoft#6532, we thought it would be a good idea to add "bindings" as an overload for "keybindings", as we were no longer going to use the keybindings array for just keybindings. We were going to add commands. So we started secretly treating `"bindings"` the same as `"keybindings"`. Then, in microsoft#7175, we discussed using "actions" as the key for the list of commands/keybindings/global actions, instead of using "bindings". We're going to be using this array as the global list of all actions, so it makes sense to just call it `"actions"`. This PR renames "bindings" to "actions". Fortunately, we never documented the "bindings" overload in the first place, so we can get away with this safely, and preferably before we ship "bindings" for too long. References microsoft#6899
Summary of the Pull Request
PR Checklist
Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments
*** read the spec ***