Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Vitest version to ^1.4.0 #3028

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

tjprescott
Copy link
Member

@tjprescott tjprescott commented Mar 18, 2024

See: vitest-dev/vscode#257

To resolve the issue on my machine (Windows) I need to use the pre-release version of the vitest.dev extension. Not sure if there's a way to recommend it in .vscode/extensions.json but regardless, the vitest version needs to be bumped to support using it.

Did confirm that this pretty much resolves the issues I was having running tests.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ There is undocummented changes. Run chronus add to add a changeset or click here.

The following packages have changes but are not documented.

  • @typespec/bundler
  • @typespec/compiler
  • @typespec/eslint-plugin
  • @typespec/html-program-viewer
  • @typespec/http
  • @typespec/internal-build-utils
  • @typespec/json-schema
  • @typespec/library-linter
  • @typespec/openapi
  • @typespec/openapi3
  • @typespec/prettier-plugin-typespec
  • @typespec/protobuf
  • @typespec/rest
  • typespec-vscode
  • @typespec/versioning

@timotheeguerin
Copy link
Member

@tjprescott I am bumping all dependencies here already including vitest to 1.4.0 #3027

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

You can try these changes at https://cadlplayground.z22.web.core.windows.net/prs/3028/

Check the website changes at https://tspwebsitepr.z22.web.core.windows.net/prs/3028/

@tjprescott
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #3027

@tjprescott tjprescott closed this Mar 18, 2024
@tjprescott tjprescott deleted the bumpVitestVersion branch March 19, 2024 16:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants