-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[sdformat6] Migrate from Bitbucket to GitHub 🤖 #10859
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
Source: sdformat6 | ||
Version: 6.2.0 | ||
Version: 6.2.0-1 | ||
Homepage: http://sdformat.org/ | ||
Build-Depends: boost-any, boost-variant, ignition-math4, urdfdom, tinyxml | ||
Description: Simulation Description Format (SDF) parser and description files. | ||
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ | ||
include(vcpkg_common_functions) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We should also There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok, no problem. However typically it is common practice in open source project to prefer self-contained PRs that just fix a single problem, and don't mix solving the issue with other (even if required/important) changes. If vcpkg instead suggest to do all the deprecation-related cleanup whenever a port is modified in a PR, that is perfect ok but I suggest to describe this policy in the Mantainer Guideline: https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/blob/master/docs/maintainers/maintainer-guide.md#avoid-trivial-changes-in-untouched-files . There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed in c6ad5af . |
||
|
||
vcpkg_from_bitbucket( | ||
vcpkg_from_github( | ||
OUT_SOURCE_PATH SOURCE_PATH | ||
REPO osrf/sdformat | ||
REF sdformat6_6.2.0 | ||
SHA512 3e3934010438bffbf10c1df29bd486c098e3c1bdf2b0349b69a53fb6f4d2bd3b3c8c4b4a8dfb413da13a638c0794f41c1bff4adb11a889b1552d90ba8b94c495 | ||
SHA512 3d139ec4b4c9fbfd547ed8bfca0adb5cdca92c1b7cc4d4b554a7c51ccf755b9079c26a006ebfedc5bc5b1ba5e16ad950bb38c47ea97bf97e59a2fd7d12d60620 | ||
HEAD_REF sdf6 | ||
) | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could you please update the way to handle to copyright as There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed in c6ad5af . |
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed that
sdformat6
seemed to not support arm and uwp.So could you please add
Supports: !(arm|uwp)
field to CONTROL?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in c6ad5af .