Hide jupyter commands from other types of notebooks

[DavidKutu]

For #5559

• Pull request represents a single change (i.e. not fixing disparate/unrelated things in a single PR).
• Title summarizes what is changing.
• Has a news entry file (remember to thank yourself!).
• Appropriate comments and documentation strings in the code.
• Has sufficient logging.
• Has telemetry for enhancements.
• Unit tests & system/integration tests are added/updated.
• Test plan is updated as appropriate.
• package-lock.json has been regenerated by running npm install (if dependencies have changed).

[rchiodo]

I think we need a when clause instead

[rchiodo]

I believe we use 'Notebook' on purpose. Isn't this going to make all of those commands prefixed with 'Jupyter' instead? That seems more confusing to me.

[DavidKutu]

@rchiodo I could leave only the changes to the when clause, that's enough to fix the issue.
As of the name Jupyter or Notebook, both are going to be confusing to a group of people. I don't mind leaving one or the other.

[joyceerhl]

@rchiodo I believe Matt said in #5559 that our using 'Notebook' is confusing, because the category also indicates where the command is coming from. E.g. 'Notebook' means 'VS Code-contributed' while 'Jupyter' means 'Jupyter extension-contributed'. Since this command is contributed by the Jupyter extension I think it makes sense to prefix it with 'Jupyter'. I'm also wondering if Peng/Matt have further thoughts on this.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #5574 (eecc524) into main (689a2de) will decrease coverage by 0%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #5574   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     72%     72%   -1%     
=====================================
  Files        402     402           
  Lines      26641   26641           
  Branches    3887    3887           
=====================================
- Hits       19444   19406   -38     
- Misses      5589    5619   +30     
- Partials    1608    1616    +8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/client/api/pythonApi.ts	64% <0%> (-11%)	⬇️
src/client/datascience/openNotebookBanner.ts	80% <0%> (-8%)	⬇️
...ience/notebook/emptyNotebookCellLanguageService.ts	72% <0%> (-7%)	⬇️
src/client/common/application/applicationShell.ts	23% <0%> (-5%)	⬇️
...rc/client/datascience/jupyter/debuggerVariables.ts	75% <0%> (-4%)	⬇️
src/client/datascience/raw-kernel/rawSocket.ts	84% <0%> (-2%)	⬇️
src/client/datascience/notebook/kernelProvider.ts	87% <0%> (-2%)	⬇️
src/client/datascience/telemetry/telemetry.ts	81% <0%> (-2%)	⬇️
...t/datascience/kernel-launcher/localKernelFinder.ts	81% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
src/client/datascience/notebook/helpers/helpers.ts	72% <0%> (-1%)	⬇️
... and 5 more

[DonJayamanne]

@joyceerhl I don't think we should change the command group to Jupyter.
I have replied her #5559 (comment)

It's something we discussed as a team (I think we even have an issue for this), I believe it came out of a QP study

[DavidKutu]

@joyceerhl that's a good topic to bring up in our next sync meeting. I'd vote to have everything we contribute in the Jupyter group.