Move pytest test IDs file deletion to finally block #25540
+8
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If the vscode-pytest execution is wrapped and re-triggered then the deletion of the file causes the second run the fail. Deleting the file on the finally block ensures that the pytest execution will work even if re-run. - Move the deletion of the test IDs temp file from before pytest execution to a `finally` block. - This ensures the temp file is always cleaned up, even if pytest execution fails or an exception occurs. - Move `ids_path` initialization outside the try block so it's accessible in the finally block for cleanup.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the vscode-pytest execution is wrapped and re-triggered then the deletion of the file causes the second run the fail. Deleting the file on the finally block ensures that the pytest execution will work even if re-run.
context: #15669