I can recursively peek definitions

[joaomoreno]

Testing #6662

Recursively peeking definitions ends in this state:

After the first peek, the trees in the following peeks are always empty.

Is this expected?

[jrieken]

Is this expected?

It's cool but it should not be like that ;-)

[stevencl]

It would be great to be able to cascade peek definition (and references). Visual Studio supports cascading peek and shows a breadcrumb above the peek window to indicate how deep you have gone:

[kieferrm]

Recursive peeking is useful in a lot of situations. However, I'd expect it to reuse the existing window and on ESC or close box to take down only the most topmost one.

[jrieken]

That's in line with @stevencl suggestion. I have created a separate issue for this: #6857