Make GDI+ private types opaque #1904
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@AArnott If you'd like to run this through CsWin32, here's a winmd: |
mikebattista
previously approved these changes
May 10, 2024
|
Will merge pending approval from @AArnott. |
riverar
commented
May 10, 2024
|
I tested CsWin32 with this winmd, and full generation produces compilable code. I sign off. |
AArnott
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
mikebattista
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: #1821
Updates GDI+ private classes in metadata from
NativeTypeDefs with a single pointer-sized field to opaque empty structs for better accuracy and proper handling.