Update libvips.libvips 8.17.2 x86 installer URL and hash

[kleisauke]

Checklist for Pull Requests

• Have you signed the Contributor License Agreement?
• Is there a linked Issue?

Manifests

• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same manifest update/change?
• This PR only modifies one (1) manifest
• Have you validated your manifest locally with winget validate --manifest <path>?
• Have you tested your manifest locally with winget install --manifest <path>?
• Does your manifest conform to the 1.10 schema?

Note: <path> is the directory's name containing the manifest you're submitting.

---

Context: #308988 (comment).

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-122-322202-20251211-1

[wingetbot]

Url Validation Error

• manifests/l/libvips/libvips/8.17.2
  • https://github.com/libvips/libvips/blob/master/LICENSE
    • Http status code: ServiceUnavailable

[kleisauke]

https://github.com/libvips/libvips/blob/master/LICENSE works for me. Could someone re-validate?

[wingetbot]

@wingetbot run

[wingetbot]

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-122-322202-20251213-1

[wingetbot]

Found duplicate pull request(s)

• Manifest Path: manifests/l/libvips/libvips/8.17.2
  • Update libvips.libvips 8.17.2 license #322205

[stephengillie]

Automatic Validation ended with:

Executable C:\Users\Validator\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Links\vips.exe returned exit code: -1073741515

Hex	Dec	Inverted Dec	Symbol	Description
C0000135	-1073741515	3221225781	STATUS_DLL_NOT_FOUND	Possibly due to a missing dependency. (The most common dependency is Microsoft.VCRedist.2015+.x64 / .x86)

(Automated response - build 1178.)

[stephengillie]

Close with reason: Duplicate of #322205;

[kleisauke]

Close with reason: Duplicate of #322205;

@stephengillie This is not a duplicate of #322205; that PR only changes the license.

[kleisauke]

As an aside, even if this were a duplicate (which is not the case), closing an older PR in favor of a newer one would be odd.

[kleisauke]

Second attempt here: #323211.

[stephengillie]

Close with reason: Duplicate of #322205;

@ stephengillie This is not a duplicate of #322205; that PR only changes the license.

Apologies - my automation closes duplicates solely based on labels and pipeline completion. It doesn't evaluate the manifest contents.

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Hello @kleisauke,

We've identified this as a duplicate of another issue or PR that already exists. This specific instance is being closed in favor of the linked issue. Please add your 👍 to the other issue to raise its priority. Thanks for your contribution!

Template: msftbot/duplicate/closed

[kleisauke]

Close with reason: Duplicate of #322205;

@ stephengillie This is not a duplicate of #322205; that PR only changes the license.

Apologies - my automation closes duplicates solely based on labels and pipeline completion. It doesn't evaluate the manifest contents.

No problem. I thought it had been closed manually, perhaps including (Automated response) in the comment would make this clearer.