Add Adobe.Acrobat.Reader.64-Bit v21.007.20099

[Trenly]

I specifically chose the package identifier to allow for Adobe.Acrobat.Pro to be added later.
This is required to be separate from the 32-bit version until the 1.1 schema which will allow for ARP entry matching, as the 32 bit version of Acrobat Reader and the 64 bit version of Acrobat Reader have different ARP data.

• Have you signed the Contributor License Agreement?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same manifest update/change?
• Have you validated your manifest locally with winget validate --manifest <path>?
• Have you tested your manifest locally with winget install --manifest <path>?
• Does your manifest conform to the 1.0 schema?

Note: <path> is the name of the directory containing the manifest you're submitting.

---

Closes #32785

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[wingetbot]

   

[wingetbot]

/AzurePipelines run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[jedieaston]

Suggested change

	Moniker: acrobatreader
	Moniker: adobe-reader

People usually refer to this app in speech as Adobe Reader. Unless someone has an objection, the moniker should probably be changed.

[Trenly]

I was simply going with what was originally in the 32-bit version; I don't have an objection to changing it, but addiitonal opinions would be appreciated

[jedieaston]

We shouldn't have a moniker pointing to two different PackageIdentifiers, that means you can't use it to install the package. So maybe adobe-reader-x64?

[ghost]

Hello @wingetbot!

Because this pull request has the Validation-Completed label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

[ghost]

Hello @Trenly,
Validation has completed.

[wingetbot]

Publish pipeline succeeded for this Pull Request. Once you refresh your index, this change should be present.

[denelon]

I have microsoft/winget-cli#906 in the backlog to support specifying architecture settings/preferences. I believe we default to the "best" architecture for the available installers. I'm not sure there is a reason to have a separate package.