fix: don't break on doctests #109
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix AttributeError: 'DoctestItem' object has no attribute 'fixturenames'.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 6f97dc0 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. View more on Code Climate. |
1 task
|
Thanks! I'm going to try to add a Co-authored attribution during the squash and merge, hopefully it works. ;) |
andreoliwa
added a commit
to andreoliwa/nitpick
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2022
- Fix AttributeError: 'DoctestItem' object has no attribute 'fixturenames' - See miketheman/pytest-socket#109 Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <bot@renovateapp.com> Co-authored-by: W. Augusto Andreoli <andreoliwa@gmail.com>
|
Released in 0.5.1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix AttributeError: 'DoctestItem' object has no attribute 'fixturenames'.
Fix #105.
I am piggybacking on @orf's pull request and adding a test to it: #107
Thank you both!