Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean SWIG bindings + add doc #56

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Aug 1, 2016

Conversation

cchampet
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 23, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 62.3% when pulling 3ef4ebd on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

@cchampet cchampet force-pushed the dev_cleanSWIGBindings branch 2 times, most recently from 221d439 to f4da9e2 Compare May 23, 2016 13:57
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 23, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 62.3% when pulling f4da9e2 on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 23, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 62.3% when pulling f4da9e2 on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

@@ -127,6 +129,7 @@ class Sequence

inline std::string getSuffix() const;

#ifndef SWIG
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you want to remove this function from the binding?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found a way to integrate this method to the SWIG interfaces: 66e7002

Clement Champetier added 3 commits May 24, 2016 14:34
Instead of redefine them in Python, and ignore them in Java.
Instead of redefine them in Python, and ignore them in Java.
@cchampet cchampet force-pushed the dev_cleanSWIGBindings branch from cb6ba7e to f523753 Compare May 24, 2016 12:38
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 24, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.5%) to 61.891% when pulling f523753 on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

@cchampet cchampet changed the title [WIP] Clean SWIG bindings + add doc Clean SWIG bindings + add doc May 24, 2016
@cchampet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@fabiencastan Ready to be merged ;)

Clement Champetier added 5 commits August 1, 2016 12:13
* Instanciate tempate type "TimePair".
* Updated SWIG type "Time" to match C++ type (fixed the following SWIG
error: "cannot convert ‘std::pair<int, int>*’ to ‘std::pair<long int,
long int>*’ in assignment").
* Need to appy typemaps to handle output parameters.
* Need to define a custom typemap for std::string.
* Initialize the output arguments.
* Needed when calling this method from a SWIG interface.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 63.148% when pulling 7176cb8 on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 1, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.7%) to 63.148% when pulling 7176cb8 on cchampet:dev_cleanSWIGBindings into 262391f on mikrosimage:develop.

@cchampet cchampet merged commit 19a9549 into mikrosimage:develop Aug 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants