Remove Igno as BDFL #62
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm +1. Others in the core team have objected to this in the past, we never got around to change it.
Not only. When this RFC was adopted, there was still an expectancy that Igno might be coming back, and nobody was comfortable restricting Igno's authority over the project at the time. I'm adding as a point to the next governance meeting agenda. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Decentralized projects should not have a "Benevolent Dictator For Life". I think keeping that statement, while probably meant as merely a nod to his awesome work starting this project, does more harm than good.