-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make decommission test more reliable #2018
Make decommission test more reliable #2018
Conversation
Next step: Get log when test fails |
Log when it passes: |
Rerunning decommission again... |
I am going to execute 10 times this test or as many as needed to get the failure, I want to see how reliable it is and how to make it more robust |
check this test, have failed 4 times, if this a true possitive would be good to know why it failed |
17943b3
to
d5ff329
Compare
Thank you Pedro, I see the failure is after new pool is added:
|
I haven't been able to reproduce this failure yet, and I currently don't understand its root cause. However, this issue arises intermittently when adding a new pool. To address it, I will start by increasing the timeout from 300 seconds to 600 seconds and observe if this makes the test more reliable. Perhaps it's just a matter of giving the pool enough time to be properly added. |
d5ff329
to
b33dfde
Compare
Another cause of failure was a missing object following decommission. I am printing the list of objects to further debug this issue:
|
b33dfde
to
472d60a
Compare
This version is more stable than before. If any further issues arise, please notify me, and I will work to find solutions to make it even better. |
4214a68
to
9aeaab8
Compare
9aeaab8
to
6332d7b
Compare
Objective:
Enhance the stability of our decommissioning test.