Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extraction is broken in 8.4 #93

Closed
JasonGross opened this issue Nov 5, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Extraction is broken in 8.4 #93

JasonGross opened this issue Nov 5, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
@andres-erbsen

Comments

@JasonGross
Copy link
Collaborator 

File "/home/jgross/Documents/repos/fiat-crypto-8.4/src/Experiments/Ed25519Extraction.v", line 289, characters 0-84:
Error: The 1st argument (n) of WordUtil.cast_word still occurs after extraction.
Please check the Extraction Implicit declarations.
dderjoel added a commit to dderjoel/fiat-crypto that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
@dderjoel
another test case
2cd122c 
Unable to unify: [inr [351, 349, 350]] == [inr [103, 108, 110]]
Could not unify the values at index 0: [mit-plv#351, mit-plv#349, mit-plv#350] != [mit-plv#103, mit-plv#108, mit-plv#110]
index 0: mit-plv#351 != mit-plv#103
(slice 0 44, [mit-plv#345]) != (slice 0 44, [mit-plv#100])
index 0: mit-plv#345 != mit-plv#100
(add 64, [mit-plv#58, mit-plv#95, mit-plv#343]) != (add 64, [mit-plv#58, mit-plv#98])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, mit-plv#343]) != (add 64, [mit-plv#98])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, (mul 64, [mit-plv#95, mit-plv#331])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, mit-plv#95])])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, (mul 64, [mit-plv#95, (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, mit-plv#95])])
(add 64, [(or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93]), (mul 64, [(or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93]), (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [(const 5, []), (or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93])])])
JasonGross pushed a commit to dderjoel/fiat-crypto that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
@dderjoel @JasonGross
another test case
067efc4 
Unable to unify: [inr [351, 349, 350]] == [inr [103, 108, 110]]
Could not unify the values at index 0: [mit-plv#351, mit-plv#349, mit-plv#350] != [mit-plv#103, mit-plv#108, mit-plv#110]
index 0: mit-plv#351 != mit-plv#103
(slice 0 44, [mit-plv#345]) != (slice 0 44, [mit-plv#100])
index 0: mit-plv#345 != mit-plv#100
(add 64, [mit-plv#58, mit-plv#95, mit-plv#343]) != (add 64, [mit-plv#58, mit-plv#98])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, mit-plv#343]) != (add 64, [mit-plv#98])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, (mul 64, [mit-plv#95, mit-plv#331])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, mit-plv#95])])
(add 64, [mit-plv#95, (mul 64, [mit-plv#95, (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, mit-plv#95])])
(add 64, [(or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93]), (mul 64, [(or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93]), (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [(const 5, []), (or 64, [mit-plv#91, mit-plv#93])])])
JasonGross pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2022
@dderjoel @JasonGross
another test case
b949c76 
Unable to unify: [inr [351, 349, 350]] == [inr [103, 108, 110]]
Could not unify the values at index 0: [#351, #349, #350] != [#103, #108, #110]
index 0: #351 != #103
(slice 0 44, [#345]) != (slice 0 44, [#100])
index 0: #345 != #100
(add 64, [#58, #95, #343]) != (add 64, [#58, #98])
(add 64, [#95, #343]) != (add 64, [#98])
(add 64, [#95, (mul 64, [#95, #331])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, #95])])
(add 64, [#95, (mul 64, [#95, (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [#3, #95])])
(add 64, [(or 64, [#91, #93]), (mul 64, [(or 64, [#91, #93]), (const 4, [])])]) != (add 64, [(mul 64, [(const 5, []), (or 64, [#91, #93])])])
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@andres-erbsen andres-erbsen

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JasonGross @andres-erbsen