Multi-license under MIT OR Apache-2.0 OR BSD-1-Clause #881
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JasonGross
requested review from
davidben,
andres-erbsen,
achlipala and
jadephilipoom
mdempsky
reviewed
Sep 23, 2020
JasonGross
force-pushed
the
multi-license
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c3ce362 to
017a2c2
Compare
|
Looks fine, relative to my meager knowledge of the subject! |
JasonGross
force-pushed
the
multi-license
branch
from
017a2c2 to
7c9ed8d
Compare
Hopefully this will satisfy the Go team and might come closer to getting us into OpenSSL. We follow https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/e0bc267512fc0cb49c86978192857e8187017f0b#license and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e0bc267512fc0cb49c86978192857e8187017f0b/COPYRIGHT for wording.
JasonGross
force-pushed
the
multi-license
branch
from
7c9ed8d to
f3ef8b1
Compare
agl
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2020
|
Approved on behalf of Google to relicense as all of MIT, Apache-2.0, and BSD-1-Clause. |
|
(Removed myself from the reviewer list since AGL has responded.) |
andres-erbsen
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2020
jadephilipoom
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2020
achlipala
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2020
|
Thanks for making the effort to do this. OpenSSL is looking into ways to move to using this and ECC-Kila as an option. |
JasonGross
added a commit
to mit-plv/rewriter
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2020
As per mit-plv/fiat-crypto#881, since the rewriter code is effectively just a separate repo for part of the fiat-crypto project.
JasonGross
added a commit
to JasonGross/opam-coq-archive
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hopefully this will satisfy the Go team and might come closer to getting
us into OpenSSL.
We follow
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/e0bc267512fc0cb49c86978192857e8187017f0b#license
and
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/e0bc267512fc0cb49c86978192857e8187017f0b/COPYRIGHT
for wording.
Got out-of-band approval from all the people (and representatives of all the companies) in
AUTHORS. Please review for whether the way I'm laying things out seems good.