don't recommend making layout.js "use client" for app router installation in nextjs #1953
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is pretty wrong – it's not recommended in nextjs to "use client" for the root layout. Would save people some time not to recommend this pattern and to use a Provider wrapper instead. In testing, I also found that autotrack doesn't work as expected with app router. We added some additional logic to usePathname and just implement that inside the provider, which I left out for simplicity here but is probably worth flagging as well.
|
@anngbaum is attempting to deploy a commit to the Mixpanel Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is pretty wrong – it's not recommended in nextjs to "use client" for the root layout. Would save people some time not to recommend this pattern and to use a Provider wrapper instead.