-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add web binding Tokenizer.tokenToId()
#41
Open
grf53
wants to merge
1
commit into
mlc-ai:main
Choose a base branch
from
grf53:token-to-id
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+32
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we still align with sentencepiece and still return unk when the token is not found?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @Ubospica. Thanks for your comment!
I am not sure about current circumstances with sentencepiece, but I just wanted to enable
tokenToId
in web.As I can see in the following description of
Tokenizer.TokenToId()
, -1 would be returned when it could not find the corresponding id.tokenizers-cpp/include/tokenizers_cpp.h
Lines 65 to 68 in 5de6f65
The mentioned function is implementing that virtual method, so I wanted to make it as that.
(For HFTokenizer, it is already covered as I saw.)
As I understood, UNK token from sentencepiece tokenizer could be sth other than -1 due to the configuration. So I added explicit check with
sentence_piece_ .unk_id()
. But as I mentioned in the first comment, I am not sure this logic is really consistent considering practical uses, so you can suggest me to modify or revert that part to align it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @grf53, thank you for your explanation!
I think we should still align with Huggingface tokenizers, which means returning unk_token instead of -1 when the token does not exist. Additionally, please add tests to ensure that unk_token is returned for non-existent tokens.
For the current implementation of HFTokenizer, we will later modify it to return unk_token instead of -1.
Thanks again for your contribution!