Bump up containerd to v1.7.6

[ktock]

Release note: https://github.com/containerd/containerd/releases/tag/v1.7.6

[jedevc]

Windows failure looks to be genuine, seems related to containerd/containerd@38d4e50.

[ktock]

@jedevc It seems that platforms.Parse() on windows now fills OSVersion field with the underlying OS's version information. : https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/v1.7.6/platforms/platforms.go#L200

So maybe we need to explicitly clear that field in the purl package to pass the test. Another option is to fix the test to allow OSVersion field being filled. 2f5e841 implements the former but please let me know if we should take another approach.

[thaJeztah]

• Looks like that change was made in Invoke stable ABI compliant platform check in windows matcher containerd/containerd#8778

[jedevc]

@jedevc It seems that platforms.Parse() on windows now fills OSVersion field with the underlying OS's version information. : containerd/containerd@v1.7.6/platforms/platforms.go#L200

So maybe we need to explicitly clear that field in the purl package to pass the test. Another option is to fix the test to allow OSVersion field being filled. 2f5e841 implements the former but please let me know if we should take another approach.

I think the PURL should probably contain the OSVersion if it's set - I think we can handle this in the test.

[ktock]

Thanks for the comment.

I think we can handle this in the test.

Fixed the test to handle OSVersion.

I think the PURL should probably contain the OSVersion if it's set

purl pkg seems to use platforms.Format and this always drops OSVersion.

buildkit/util/purl/image.go

Line 51 in 2f5e841

Value: platforms.Format(p),

[jedevc]

@ktock I'm going to close this, since it's succeeded by #4315 (and so we avoid having the same discussions in both places).

Feel free to re-open if we should keep it 🎉