forked from rust-lang/rust
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Harnesses verifying slice types for add, sub and offset #179
Open
szlee118
wants to merge
28
commits into
model-checking:main
Choose a base branch
from
stogaru:verify/ptr_mut_slice_types
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 27 commits
Commits
Show all changes
28 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9a8993d
added common codes for all proof of contracts
xsxszab 55950bb
implemented integer type proof for contract for fn add, sub and offset
xsxszab ce13e8f
Merge branch 'main' into verify/ptr_mut
stogaru 3682858
Adds proofs for tuple types
stogaru a6d4d62
Renames harnesses
stogaru dec8c30
Added unit type proofs for mut ptr
MayureshJoshi25 2be7639
Merge pull request #8 from stogaru/verify/ptr_mut_unit_types
stogaru 75179dc
Merge branch 'verify/ptr_mut' into verify/ptr_mut_integer_types
xsxszab 34c670e
Merge pull request #6 from stogaru/verify/ptr_mut_integer_types
xsxszab 66c956e
Merge branch 'verify/ptr_mut' into verify/ptr_mut_composite
stogaru d9b8c65
Merge pull request #7 from stogaru/verify/ptr_mut_composite
stogaru 0faac46
Combined macros
stogaru 82345de
Fixes a typo
stogaru 656209b
Removes an unnecessary attribute
stogaru 46e839c
Merge pull request #9 from stogaru/verify/ptr_mut_combined
stogaru 96a8a2e
refactored function contracts for add, sub and offset using the same_…
xsxszab 852e96f
merged macros for add, sub and offset
xsxszab 04bd61e
updated function contracts and proof for contracts for add(), sub() a…
xsxszab 7557fc5
added support for unit type pointers
xsxszab 76b2311
updated function contracts, removed unnecessary kani::assmue
xsxszab cb6a177
added comments to function contracts
xsxszab 6385d4a
Merge pull request #12 from stogaru/verify/ptr_mut_refactor_harness
xsxszab a079a7a
added comments for magic numbers
xsxszab 214f84d
Merge branch 'main' into verify/ptr_mut
stogaru b77ae5a
Add slice harness for mut
szlee118 d105db4
Merge branch 'main' into verify/ptr_mut_slice_types
carolynzech 57b898b
Merge branch 'main' into verify/ptr_mut_slice_types
szlee118 6bb08fa
Remove duplicated and incorrect line from last merge
szlee118 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't 5 too low? How is the verification performance numbers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Explained in another PR's comment that 5 is enough for this case.
This
performance
statement is outdated, and has been removed by newest commit.