Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(check): check now works properly with confined conditions (#1880) #1882

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023
Merged

fix(check): check now works properly with confined conditions (#1880) #1882

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

spaulins-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #1882 (8ec09c7) into develop (c261ee8) will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 0.0%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #1882     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     72.2%   72.2%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files          257     257             
  Lines        56411   56414      +3     
=========================================
- Hits         40757   40751      -6     
- Misses       15654   15663      +9
Files Changed Coverage Δ
flopy/pakbase.py 81.4% <0.0%> (-0.4%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@spaulins-usgs spaulins-usgs merged commit 8c330a7 into modflowpy:develop Jul 27, 2023
wpbonelli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2023
@spaulins-usgs @scottrp @wpbonelli
fix(check): check now works properly with confined conditions (#1880) (…
7e8a0cb 
…#1882)

* fix(check): check now works properly with confined conditions (#1880)

* github workflows undo

---------

Co-authored-by: scottrp <45947939+scottrp@users.noreply.github.com>
@wpbonelli wpbonelli mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2023
Merged
@wpbonelli wpbonelli mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@spaulins-usgs @scottrp