ICD11 equivalence issues: Follow-ups with WHO

[joeflack4]

Overview

When working on the ICD11 ingest, we were getting errors related to inferred equivalence. We temporarily have worked around this via robot remove --axioms equivalents. However we need bring this up with WHO. We imagine that they may need to do some work to address these issues, and that may entail further updates on our end afterwards.

Sub-tasks

• 1. Notify WHO about issues
• 2. Handle any follow-ups that may arise

Related

• ICD11 equivalence issues #4
• Google doc for WHO questions

[joeflack4]

@matentzn Just pinging to remind you about this, as a WHO meeting is coming up soon; IDK if this is in scope for that meeting. (CC @twhetzel )

[twhetzel]

Thanks for the tag on this!

[matentzn]

Its TMD for the meeting, but I will make sure we can have a follow up. I know there were some other questions we wanted to ask, like where to get up-to-date foundation releases from. Do you have such a list of questions?

[joeflack4]

Some questions we thought of asking:

1. Do they have a more up to date OWL, or means of getting one at a stable URL.
2. Can we put it on OLS?

Added these to google doc for questions.