Skip to content

RUBY-2220 Move find command construction code into operations layer #2275

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 5, 2021

Conversation

p-mongo
Copy link
Contributor

@p-mongo p-mongo commented Jun 18, 2021

No description provided.

@p-mongo p-mongo force-pushed the 2220 branch 3 times, most recently from 3e0f7a1 to 4781ceb Compare June 29, 2021 12:52
@p-mongo p-mongo changed the title RUBY-2220 2220 RUBY-2220 Move find command construction code into operations layer Jun 30, 2021
@p-mongo
Copy link
Contributor Author

p-mongo commented Jun 30, 2021

@p-mongo p-mongo force-pushed the 2220 branch 3 times, most recently from f70fe72 to f7cf720 Compare June 30, 2021 20:00
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
double('description').tap do |description|
expect(description).to receive(:mongos?) { false }
expect(description).to receive(:standalone?) { false }
expect(description).to receive(:load_balancer?) { false }
#expect(description).to receive(:load_balancer?) { false }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe delete it or add a couple of words why it is commented out?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might need this later, I haven't actually investigated in detail why this diff makes this invocation not happen. I'll review this line before completing the epic.

@p-mongo p-mongo merged commit 2d9f021 into mongodb:master Jul 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants