Skip to content

deps(NODE-6940): FY26Q2 lint-related dependency updates #4527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

deps(NODE-6940): FY26Q2 lint-related dependency updates #4527

wants to merge 6 commits into from
+1,211 −6,912

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson changed the title deps(NODE-xxxx): FY26Q2 lint-related dependency updates deps(NODE-6940): FY26Q2 lint-related dependency updates Apr 30, 2025
@baileympearson baileympearson marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2025 16:31
@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2025 16:31
@nbbeeken nbbeeken self-assigned this May 1, 2025
@nbbeeken nbbeeken added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label May 1, 2025
nbbeeken
nbbeeken requested changes May 1, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@nbbeeken nbbeeken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

conflicts, otherwise LGTM. nice that we catch the mistaken for-await now

@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from nbbeeken May 2, 2025 14:59
nbbeeken
nbbeeken requested changes May 2, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@nbbeeken nbbeeken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the lock file is "out of sync" according to the check-deps CI

@durran durran assigned durran and unassigned nbbeeken May 4, 2025
@durran
Copy link
Member

durran commented May 4, 2025

the lock file is "out of sync" according to the check-deps CI

Still the same happening.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nbbeeken nbbeeken nbbeeken requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@durran durran

Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@baileympearson @durran @nbbeeken