Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[draft] weird error message, T::of vs of #1213

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

bobzhang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bobzhang bobzhang changed the title weird error message, T::of vs of [draft] weird error message, T::of vs of Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

Observed Problems

  1. Potential Typo in Function Call:

    • In the from_array test, the function @list.of is called with an array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. However, the function name of might be a typo if the intended function is from_array or similar, which is conventionally used to convert arrays to lists. If of is indeed the correct function, this is not an issue, but it's worth double-checking the function name for accuracy.
  2. Incorrect Type Annotation for el:

    • The type annotation for el is given as @list.T[Int], which seems incorrect if @list.Nil is intended to represent an empty list. Typically, Nil is used to denote an empty list, and it should match the type List[Int] if the list contains integers. Ensure that @list.Nil is correctly typed to match the expected list type.
  3. Usage of @json.inspect!:

    • The @json.inspect! function is used with ls, where the content is specified as [1,2,3,4,5]. This might work if @json.inspect! expects a JSON-like structure, but it's crucial to verify that the function indeed expects an array in this format. If @json.inspect! expects a JSON string, the content should be "[1,2,3,4,5]" instead.

Summary of Suggestions

  1. Verify Function Name: Ensure that of is the correct function name for converting an array to a list.
  2. Correct Type Annotation: Update the type annotation for el to match the expected list type, likely List[Int].
  3. Content Format for @json.inspect!: Ensure the content format [1,2,3,4,5] is correct for @json.inspect!, or adjust it if a different format (like a JSON string) is required.

These suggestions aim to address potential issues related to typos, type annotations, and function parameter formats in the provided git diff output.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant