Return implementation

[MitchBodmer]

Here's a first go at the Return method. #615

[atifaziz]

Thanks for submitting the PR! I've conducted a first review. It's a good start but what I found missing most were tests for all the members of the list returned by Return.

[atifaziz]

Thanks for working through all changes from the previous review very promptly. This is a quick review for now with only a since issue that needs addressing.

[atifaziz]

Thanks for adding all those tests! Looking much better and I think we are nearly there. 🏁

Also, could I ask you to add Return to the operators list in README.md and the project/package description?

[atifaziz]

This is beginning to really take up shape! Thanks for all those well-reading tests! There are just a few edits left now and then we're good to go with this!

I took the liberty to make a change myself with 236daef as it would have been too painful to describe in words. 😄 It associates the test cases with the test so this is how they appear named and organised:

[atifaziz]

Thanks @MitchBodmer for working through the review and contributing this in the first place! Looking good to ship now! 🎉

---

PS I might make some minor formatting changes before merging.

[MitchBodmer]

@atifaziz
Happy to do it. Thank you for being open to the feature and for the excellent code review.