feat: nolocal flag support for bridges

[oldrich-s]

#736

[robertsLando]

Also please add a unit test that covers this and fix broken tests

[robertsLando]

@gnought Opinions on this one?

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2232406743

• 0 of 13 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 99.736%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 2231280775:	-0.2%
Covered Lines:	808
Relevant Lines:	808

---

💛 - Coveralls

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2232406743

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 15 of 15 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 99.736%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 2231280775:	-0.2%
Covered Lines:	808
Relevant Lines:	808

---

💛 - Coveralls

[robertsLando]

LGTM. Thanks for this PR @oldrich-s ! Is it ready to merge?

[oldrich-s]

LGTM. Thanks for this PR @oldrich-s ! Is it ready to merge?

I have just added qos 1 test (just to be sure that persistence works as expected). But otherwise I believe it is ready to be merged.

[robertsLando]

LGTM. Good to merge?

[oldrich-s]

LGTM. Good to merge?

yeps 👍