Conversation
WalkthroughThis change introduces a complete event management feature, including domain entities, repositories, services, DTOs, and a REST controller for CRUD operations on events and their attachments. The update adds projection records, error handling enhancements, S3 integration for file attachments, and request/response structures for API endpoints. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant EventController
participant EventService
participant EventJpaRepository
participant EventAttachmentService
participant EventAttachmentRepository
participant S3Service
Client->>EventController: POST /event (EventRequest)
EventController->>EventService: createEvent(EventRequest)
EventService->>EventJpaRepository: save(EventJpaEntity)
EventService->>EventAttachmentService: createAttachment(FileRequest, EventJpaEntity)
EventAttachmentService->>EventAttachmentRepository: save(EventAttachmentJpaEntity)
EventAttachmentService->>S3Service: Upload file to S3
EventService-->>EventController: Success
EventController-->>Client: 201 Created
Client->>EventController: GET /event/list
EventController->>EventService: getEvents()
EventService->>EventJpaRepository: findAllWithAttachment()
EventService->>S3Service: getPublicUrl(s3Key)
EventService-->>EventController: List<EventResponse>
EventController-->>Client: 200 OK (List<EventResponse>)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @chominju02, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a comprehensive event management system, providing full CRUD capabilities for events within the application. It establishes new data models for events and their attachments, integrates with S3 for file storage, and refines existing entity structures for improved maintainability. The changes enable robust handling of event-related data and associated files.
Highlights
- Event Management API: Implemented a full set of REST endpoints for creating, retrieving (all and by ID), updating, and deleting event records.
- Event and Attachment Data Models: Introduced new JPA entities (
EventJpaEntity,EventAttachmentJpaEntity) and their corresponding repositories (EventJpaRepository,EventAttachmentRepository) to manage event data and associated file attachments. - S3 Integration for Attachments: Developed
EventAttachmentServiceto handle the lifecycle of event attachments, including saving and deleting files, leveraging an existingFileUploadHelperandS3Service. - Data Transfer Objects (DTOs): Defined new DTOs (
EventRequest,EventResponse,DurationRequest,AttachmentProjection,EventWithAttachmentProjection) to facilitate data exchange between the presentation layer and the service layer, and for efficient data retrieval via JPA projections. - Entity Refinement: Modified
EventJpaEntityto streamline its structure, replacingeventDescription,eventImg, anduserIdwith atitlefield and adding anupdatemethod for cleaner entity management. - Error Handling: Added a new
EVENT_NOT_FOUNDerror code toErrorCode.javafor robust error management.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
| if (eventAttachmentRepository.findByEventId(entity.getId()).isPresent()) { | ||
| eventAttachmentRepository.deleteByEventId(entity.getId()); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The deleteAttachment method only deletes the attachment record from the database but does not delete the corresponding file from S3. This will lead to orphaned files in your S3 bucket, consuming storage and potentially incurring costs.
eventAttachmentRepository.findByEventId(entity.getId()).ifPresent(attachment -> {
s3Service.deleteFile(attachment);
eventAttachmentRepository.delete(attachment);
});| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The deleteEvent method throws a CustomRuntimeException with ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND when an event is not found. This is misleading; it should be ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND.
| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND)); | |
| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND)); |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java (2)
52-52: Address commented-out security annotations.Same security concern as the POST endpoint.
62-62: Address commented-out security annotations.Same security concern as the other admin endpoints.
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventRequest.java (1)
20-23: Potential null pointer exception in optionalAttachment method.The method directly assigns
this.attachmenttoparsedAttachmentwithout any processing, making the variable name misleading. Also, consider defensive programming practices.Simplify the method and make it more explicit:
-public List<FileRequest> optionalAttachment() { - FileRequest parsedAttachment = this.attachment; - return parsedAttachment == null ? List.of() : List.of(parsedAttachment); -} +public List<FileRequest> optionalAttachment() { + return this.attachment == null ? List.of() : List.of(this.attachment); +}src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventJpaRepository.java (1)
27-43: Code duplication between queries.The two queries are nearly identical, differing only in the WHERE clause. This violates the DRY principle and makes maintenance harder.
Consider refactoring to reduce duplication by creating a private method with the base query:
public interface EventJpaRepository extends JpaRepository<EventJpaEntity, Long> { + String BASE_QUERY = """ + select new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.EventWithAttachmentProjection( + e.id, + e.title, + e.duration.endDate, + e.eventLink, + new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.AttachmentProjection( + ea.fileName, + ea.s3Key + ) + ) + from EventJpaEntity e + left join EventAttachmentJpaEntity ea + on e.id = ea.eventId + """; - @Query(""" - select new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.EventWithAttachmentProjection( - e.id, - e.title, - e.duration.endDate, - e.eventLink, - new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.AttachmentProjection( - ea.fileName, - ea.s3Key - ) - ) - from EventJpaEntity e - left join EventAttachmentJpaEntity ea - on e.id = ea.eventId - """) + @Query(BASE_QUERY) List<EventWithAttachmentProjection> findAllWithAttachment(); - @Query(""" - select new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.EventWithAttachmentProjection( - e.id, - e.title, - e.duration.endDate, - e.eventLink, - new life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.AttachmentProjection( - ea.fileName, - ea.s3Key - ) - ) - from EventJpaEntity e - left join EventAttachmentJpaEntity ea - on e.id = ea.eventId - WHERE e.id = :id - """) + @Query(BASE_QUERY + " WHERE e.id = :id") Optional<EventWithAttachmentProjection> findWithAttachmentById(Long id); }src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventAttachmentService.java (1)
43-47: Optimize attachment deletion by removing unnecessary existence check.The current implementation checks for existence before deletion, which is unnecessary since JPA delete operations are idempotent.
- public void deleteAttachment(EventJpaEntity entity) { - if (eventAttachmentRepository.findByEventId(entity.getId()).isPresent()) { - eventAttachmentRepository.deleteByEventId(entity.getId()); - } - } + public void deleteAttachment(EventJpaEntity entity) { + eventAttachmentRepository.deleteByEventId(entity.getId()); + }src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventService.java (3)
31-31: Reconsider transaction propagation for read-only operations.Using
Propagation.SUPPORTSfor read-only operations is unusual. Consider using the defaultREQUIREDpropagation or removing the propagation parameter entirely.- @Transactional(readOnly = true, propagation = Propagation.SUPPORTS) + @Transactional(readOnly = true)
45-45: Reconsider transaction propagation for read-only operations.Same issue as the previous read-only method.
- @Transactional(readOnly = true, propagation = Propagation.SUPPORTS) + @Transactional(readOnly = true)
66-67: Consider optimizing attachment update strategy.The current approach deletes all attachments and recreates them, which may be inefficient for large attachment sets. Consider implementing a diff-based update strategy that only modifies changed attachments.
This could be optimized to:
- Compare existing vs new attachments
- Delete only removed attachments
- Add only new attachments
- Keep unchanged attachments as-is
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java (1)
33-33: Inconsistent HTTP status usage in ResponseEntity construction.The response returns
ResponseEntity.ok()but setsHttpStatus.CREATEDin the wrapper. Consider usingResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED)for consistency.- return ResponseEntity.ok(ApiResponseWrapper.success(HttpStatus.CREATED, "이벤트 등록 성공")); + return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.CREATED) + .body(ApiResponseWrapper.success(HttpStatus.CREATED, "이벤트 등록 성공"));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventAttachmentService.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventService.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/AttachmentProjection.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentJpaEntity.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentRepository.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventJpaEntity.java(2 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventJpaRepository.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventWithAttachmentProjection.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/exception/ErrorCode.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/util/FileRequest.java(3 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/DurationRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventRequest.java(1 hunks)src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventResponse.java(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build-and-deploy
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/exception/ErrorCode.java (1)
62-64: LGTM! Error code follows established patterns.The new event-related error code is properly implemented with consistent naming, appropriate HTTP status, and Korean error message that aligns with the existing codebase patterns.
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/global/util/FileRequest.java (1)
75-83: LGTM! Method follows established patterns.The new
toEventAttachmentEntitymethod is well-implemented and consistent with existing conversion methods. The use ofVisibility.PUBLICis appropriate for event attachments.src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentRepository.java (2)
8-8: Add @transactional annotation for delete operation.The
deleteByEventIdmethod should be annotated with@Transactionalto ensure the operation is performed within a transaction context.+import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional; + +@Transactional void deleteByEventId(Long eventId);Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
10-10: Verify EventAttachmentRepository.findByEventId Return TypeThe current method signature in
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentRepository.javaOptional<EventAttachmentJpaEntity> findByEventId(Long eventId);implies only one attachment per event. If your domain allows multiple attachments for a single event, this should return a collection:
- Optional<EventAttachmentJpaEntity> findByEventId(Long eventId); + List<EventAttachmentJpaEntity> findByEventId(Long eventId);Otherwise, please ensure:
- The database schema enforces a one-to-one mapping (e.g. unique constraint on
event_attachment.event_id).- Your JPA entity reflects that (e.g. use
@OneToOneinEventAttachmentJpaEntity).src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventWithAttachmentProjection.java (1)
1-13: Missing import for AttachmentProjection.The record references
AttachmentProjectionbut doesn't import it. This will cause a compilation error.Add the missing import:
package life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event; import java.time.LocalDate; +import life.mosu.mosuserver.domain.event.AttachmentProjection; public record EventWithAttachmentProjection(Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventResponse.java (1)
6-34: Well-structured DTO implementation with clean factory method.The record-based DTO design is excellent and follows modern Java practices. The factory method properly handles projection mapping and S3 URL integration.
| public record AttachmentProjection(String fileName, String s3Key) { | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation annotations and clean up formatting.
Consider adding validation annotations to ensure data integrity and remove unnecessary whitespace.
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
+
-public record AttachmentProjection(String fileName, String s3Key) {
+public record AttachmentProjection(
+ @NotBlank String fileName,
+ @NotBlank String s3Key
+) {
-
-}
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public record AttachmentProjection(String fileName, String s3Key) { | |
| } | |
| import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank; | |
| public record AttachmentProjection( | |
| @NotBlank String fileName, | |
| @NotBlank String s3Key | |
| ) { | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/AttachmentProjection.java
around lines 3 to 5, add appropriate validation annotations such as @NotNull or
@NotBlank to the record components fileName and s3Key to enforce data integrity.
Also, remove any unnecessary whitespace or blank lines within the record
declaration to clean up formatting.
| public record DurationRequest( | ||
| LocalDate startDate, | ||
| LocalDate endDate | ||
| ) { | ||
|
|
||
| public DurationJpaVO toDurationJpaVO() { | ||
| return new DurationJpaVO(startDate, endDate); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation annotations and business logic validation.
Consider adding validation to ensure data integrity and proper date relationships.
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull;
+import jakarta.validation.Valid;
+
public record DurationRequest(
+ @NotNull
LocalDate startDate,
+ @NotNull
LocalDate endDate
) {
+ public DurationRequest {
+ if (startDate != null && endDate != null && endDate.isBefore(startDate)) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("End date must be after start date");
+ }
+ }
+
public DurationJpaVO toDurationJpaVO() {
return new DurationJpaVO(startDate, endDate);
}
-
-
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public record DurationRequest( | |
| LocalDate startDate, | |
| LocalDate endDate | |
| ) { | |
| public DurationJpaVO toDurationJpaVO() { | |
| return new DurationJpaVO(startDate, endDate); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull; | |
| import jakarta.validation.Valid; | |
| public record DurationRequest( | |
| @NotNull | |
| LocalDate startDate, | |
| @NotNull | |
| LocalDate endDate | |
| ) { | |
| public DurationRequest { | |
| if (startDate != null && endDate != null && endDate.isBefore(startDate)) { | |
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("End date must be after start date"); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| public DurationJpaVO toDurationJpaVO() { | |
| return new DurationJpaVO(startDate, endDate); | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/DurationRequest.java
between lines 6 and 16, add validation annotations such as @NotNull on startDate
and endDate fields to ensure they are not null. Additionally, implement business
logic validation inside the record or in a separate validator method to check
that startDate is before or equal to endDate, throwing an appropriate exception
if this condition is violated.
| public EventJpaEntity toEntity() { | ||
| return EventJpaEntity.builder() | ||
| .title(title) | ||
| .eventLink(eventLink) | ||
| .duration(duration.toDurationJpaVO()) | ||
| .build(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential null pointer exception in toEntity method.
The method calls duration.toDurationJpaVO() without null checking, which could cause a NullPointerException if duration is null.
Add null checking or ensure validation prevents null duration:
public EventJpaEntity toEntity() {
+ if (duration == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Duration cannot be null");
+ }
return EventJpaEntity.builder()
.title(title)
.eventLink(eventLink)
.duration(duration.toDurationJpaVO())
.build();
}Alternatively, if you add the @NotNull validation suggested earlier, this defensive check may not be necessary.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public EventJpaEntity toEntity() { | |
| return EventJpaEntity.builder() | |
| .title(title) | |
| .eventLink(eventLink) | |
| .duration(duration.toDurationJpaVO()) | |
| .build(); | |
| } | |
| public EventJpaEntity toEntity() { | |
| if (duration == null) { | |
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Duration cannot be null"); | |
| } | |
| return EventJpaEntity.builder() | |
| .title(title) | |
| .eventLink(eventLink) | |
| .duration(duration.toDurationJpaVO()) | |
| .build(); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventRequest.java
around lines 25 to 31, the toEntity method calls duration.toDurationJpaVO()
without checking if duration is null, which can cause a NullPointerException. To
fix this, either add a null check before calling toDurationJpaVO or ensure that
duration is validated as non-null earlier, for example by adding a @NotNull
annotation on the duration field. If the validation is added, the null check
here can be omitted.
|
|
||
| String eventLink, | ||
|
|
||
| DurationRequest duration, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing validation for required duration field.
The duration field appears to be required for event creation but lacks validation annotations. This could allow null values to be passed through.
Add validation to ensure duration is provided:
- DurationRequest duration,
+ @NotNull
+ DurationRequest duration,Don't forget to import @NotNull:
import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank;
+import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| DurationRequest duration, | |
| // imports | |
| import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank; | |
| import jakarta.validation.constraints.NotNull; | |
| // … in EventRequest record/class declaration … | |
| @NotNull | |
| DurationRequest duration, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/dto/EventRequest.java
at line 14, the duration field lacks validation to ensure it is not null. Add
the @NotNull annotation to the duration field to enforce that it must be
provided during event creation. Also, import
javax.validation.constraints.NotNull at the top of the file to support this
annotation.
| public void update(final String title, final DurationJpaVO duration, final String eventLink) { | ||
| this.title = title; | ||
| this.duration = duration; | ||
| this.eventLink = eventLink; | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing null validation in update method.
The update method doesn't validate parameters, which could lead to data integrity issues.
Add validation to the update method:
public void update(final String title, final DurationJpaVO duration, final String eventLink) {
+ if (title == null || title.trim().isEmpty()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Title cannot be null or empty");
+ }
+ if (duration == null) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Duration cannot be null");
+ }
this.title = title;
this.duration = duration;
this.eventLink = eventLink;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public void update(final String title, final DurationJpaVO duration, final String eventLink) { | |
| this.title = title; | |
| this.duration = duration; | |
| this.eventLink = eventLink; | |
| } | |
| public void update(final String title, final DurationJpaVO duration, final String eventLink) { | |
| if (title == null || title.trim().isEmpty()) { | |
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Title cannot be null or empty"); | |
| } | |
| if (duration == null) { | |
| throw new IllegalArgumentException("Duration cannot be null"); | |
| } | |
| this.title = title; | |
| this.duration = duration; | |
| this.eventLink = eventLink; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventJpaEntity.java around
lines 50 to 55, the update method lacks null checks for its parameters, risking
data integrity. Add validation to ensure that title, duration, and eventLink are
not null before assigning them to the fields. If any parameter is null, throw an
appropriate exception such as IllegalArgumentException to prevent invalid
updates.
| @Entity | ||
| @RequiredArgsConstructor | ||
| @Getter | ||
| @Table(name = "event_attachment") | ||
| public class EventAttachmentJpaEntity extends File { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using @NoArgsConstructor instead of @requiredargsconstructor.
Since this is a JPA entity, it typically needs a no-argument constructor for JPA to work properly. The @RequiredArgsConstructor might not provide the appropriate constructor.
Use @NoArgsConstructor with appropriate access level:
@Entity
-@RequiredArgsConstructor
+@NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)
@Getter
@Table(name = "event_attachment")
public class EventAttachmentJpaEntity extends File {Add the import:
import lombok.Builder;
import lombok.Getter;
-import lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor;
+import lombok.NoArgsConstructor;
+import lombok.AccessLevel;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Entity | |
| @RequiredArgsConstructor | |
| @Getter | |
| @Table(name = "event_attachment") | |
| public class EventAttachmentJpaEntity extends File { | |
| // imports | |
| import lombok.Builder; | |
| import lombok.Getter; | |
| import lombok.NoArgsConstructor; | |
| import lombok.AccessLevel; | |
| @Entity | |
| @NoArgsConstructor(access = AccessLevel.PROTECTED) | |
| @Getter | |
| @Table(name = "event_attachment") | |
| public class EventAttachmentJpaEntity extends File { | |
| // ... | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentJpaEntity.java
around lines 15 to 19, replace the @RequiredArgsConstructor annotation with
@NoArgsConstructor to provide a no-argument constructor required by JPA. Add the
@NoArgsConstructor annotation with an appropriate access level (e.g., protected)
to ensure JPA can instantiate the entity properly. Also, include the necessary
import statement for @NoArgsConstructor.
| @Column(name = "event_id", nullable = false) | ||
| private Long eventId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing foreign key constraint annotation.
The eventId field references an event but lacks proper JPA relationship annotations. This could lead to referential integrity issues.
Consider adding proper JPA relationship annotations:
-@Column(name = "event_id", nullable = false)
-private Long eventId;
+@Column(name = "event_id", nullable = false)
+@JoinColumn(name = "event_id", referencedColumnName = "event_id")
+private Long eventId;Alternatively, you could use @ManyToOne if you want object-oriented relationship:
-@Column(name = "event_id", nullable = false)
-private Long eventId;
+@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
+@JoinColumn(name = "event_id", referencedColumnName = "event_id")
+private EventJpaEntity event;Add the import:
import jakarta.persistence.Table;
+import jakarta.persistence.JoinColumn;
+import jakarta.persistence.ManyToOne;
+import jakarta.persistence.FetchType;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/domain/event/EventAttachmentJpaEntity.java
around lines 26 to 27, the eventId field lacks JPA relationship annotations to
enforce foreign key constraints. Replace the plain Long eventId field with a
proper JPA relationship by adding a @ManyToOne annotation linking to the Event
entity, and update the field type accordingly. Also, add the necessary import
statements for the relationship annotations and the Event class to ensure
referential integrity is maintained at the database level.
| (fileRequest, eventId) -> fileRequest.toEventAttachmentEntity( | ||
| fileRequest.fileName(), | ||
| fileRequest.s3Key(), | ||
| eventEntity.getId() | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant parameter passing in attachment creation lambda.
The lambda passes fileRequest.fileName() and fileRequest.s3Key() as separate parameters when they're already accessible from the fileRequest object itself.
- (fileRequest, eventId) -> fileRequest.toEventAttachmentEntity(
- fileRequest.fileName(),
- fileRequest.s3Key(),
- eventEntity.getId()
- ),
+ (fileRequest, eventId) -> fileRequest.toEventAttachmentEntity(
+ eventId
+ ),Assuming toEventAttachmentEntity can be simplified to only require the eventId parameter.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventAttachmentService.java
around lines 33 to 37, the lambda function redundantly passes fileName and s3Key
extracted from fileRequest to toEventAttachmentEntity, even though these values
are accessible within fileRequest. Modify the lambda to call
toEventAttachmentEntity with only the eventId parameter, and update the
toEventAttachmentEntity method accordingly to use fileRequest's internal fields
directly, removing the need for separate fileName and s3Key parameters.
| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | ||
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND)); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical bug: Wrong error code used for event deletion.
The delete method uses ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND instead of ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND, which would provide incorrect error information to clients.
EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId)
- .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND));
+ .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND)); | |
| EventJpaEntity eventEntity = eventJpaRepository.findById(eventId) | |
| .orElseThrow(() -> new CustomRuntimeException(ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND)); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/application/event/EventService.java around
lines 72 to 74, replace the incorrect error code ErrorCode.FILE_NOT_FOUND with
ErrorCode.EVENT_NOT_FOUND in the orElseThrow call when the event is not found.
This ensures the correct error information is provided when an event deletion
fails due to a missing event.
| private final EventService eventService; | ||
|
|
||
| @PostMapping | ||
| // @PreAuthorize("isAuthenticated() and hasRole('ADMIN')") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Address commented-out security annotations.
The @PreAuthorize annotations are commented out, leaving admin-only operations unsecured. This presents a security risk in production.
Please verify the security implementation status and either:
- Enable the security annotations if authentication is ready
- Add TODO comments with timeline for security implementation
- Document why these operations are currently unsecured
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for security configuration and authentication setup
rg -A 3 -B 3 "PreAuthorize|SecurityConfig|WebSecurityConfig" --type javaLength of output: 16626
Enable security annotations for EventController admin endpoints
The commented-out @PreAuthorize annotations on admin operations leave these methods publicly accessible despite method security being enabled in SecurityConfig. Please either uncomment and enable these checks or document the rationale and timeline for implementing them:
• File: src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java
– Methods: createEvent, updateEvent, deleteEvent
Suggested diff (apply to each admin method):
@@ src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java
- // @PreAuthorize("isAuthenticated() and hasRole('ADMIN')")
+ @PreAuthorize("isAuthenticated() and hasRole('ADMIN')") // enforce admin-only accessIf authentication isn’t ready yet, add a // TODO with expected completion date or link to a tracking issue.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/main/java/life/mosu/mosuserver/presentation/event/EventController.java at
line 29 and similarly for the createEvent, updateEvent, and deleteEvent methods,
the @PreAuthorize annotations are commented out, leaving these admin endpoints
unsecured. To fix this, uncomment the @PreAuthorize annotations to enforce that
only authenticated users with the ADMIN role can access these methods. If
authentication is not yet implemented, add a TODO comment with an expected
completion date or a link to a tracking issue explaining when these security
checks will be enabled.
2 participants
✨ 구현한 기능
📢 논의하고 싶은 내용
🎸 기타
Summary by CodeRabbit