Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughA new login ID availability check feature was added, including a service method, controller endpoint, and response DTO. Two new interfaces were introduced to provide OpenAPI documentation for user and school controllers. Controller classes were updated to implement these documentation interfaces. Minor package refactoring and documentation enhancements were also made. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant UserController
participant UserService
participant UserRepository
Client->>UserController: GET /user/check-id?loginId=...
UserController->>UserService: isLoginIdAvailable(loginId)
UserService->>UserRepository: existsByLoginId(loginId)
UserRepository-->>UserService: Boolean (exists)
UserService-->>UserController: Boolean (isAvailable)
UserController-->>Client: ApiResponseWrapper<IsLoginIdAvailableResponse>
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @wlgns12370, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily introduces a crucial feature for user management: the ability to check the availability of a login ID before user registration. This is achieved by adding a new API endpoint and the underlying service logic. Additionally, the PR enhances the project's API documentation by integrating Swagger/OpenAPI interfaces for both user and school-related endpoints, and improves code organization by refactoring DTOs into a dedicated package.
Highlights
- Login ID Availability Check: Implemented a new API endpoint (
GET /user/check-id) and corresponding service logic to verify if a given login ID is available for registration. This check leverages theuserJpaRepositoryto determine if an ID already exists. - API Documentation Integration: Introduced dedicated documentation interfaces (
UserControllerDocs,SchoolControllerDocs) for Swagger/OpenAPI. This enhances the clarity and discoverability of API endpoints by providing structured annotations for operations, parameters, and responses. - DTO Package Refactoring: Refactored existing DTOs, such as
CustomerKeyResponse, and introduced new ones, likeIsLoginIdAvailableResponse, into a dedicateddtosubpackage. This improves code organization and maintainability by grouping related data transfer objects.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new feature to check for login ID availability. It also includes some nice refactoring, such as separating Swagger API documentation into ...Docs interfaces and organizing DTOs into a dedicated package.
The implementation looks good, but I have a few suggestions to improve input validation and code simplicity:
- Add validation to the new endpoint to reject blank login IDs. This requires annotating the controller with
@Validatedand the parameter with@NotBlank. - Simplify the new response DTO by using its constructor directly instead of a redundant static factory method.
These changes will make the new endpoint more robust and the code easier to maintain.
| @RequestMapping("/user") | ||
| @RequiredArgsConstructor | ||
| public class UserController { | ||
| public class UserController implements UserControllerDocs { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To enable method-level validation for request parameters (like the loginId in isLoginIdAvailable), this controller class should be annotated with @Validated. This is necessary for Spring to process constraint annotations on method parameters.
| public class UserController implements UserControllerDocs { | |
| @org.springframework.validation.annotation.Validated | |
| public class UserController implements UserControllerDocs { |
|
|
||
| @GetMapping("/check-id") | ||
| public ResponseEntity<ApiResponseWrapper<IsLoginIdAvailableResponse>> isLoginIdAvailable( | ||
| @RequestParam String loginId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The loginId parameter should be validated to prevent empty or blank strings from being processed. Using @NotBlank ensures that a valid login ID is provided for the check. This will trigger a ConstraintViolationException for invalid input, which can be handled globally to return a 400 Bad Request, as documented in your API.
| @RequestParam String loginId | |
| @RequestParam @jakarta.validation.constraints.NotBlank String loginId |
|
|
||
| return ResponseEntity.ok( | ||
| ApiResponseWrapper.success(HttpStatus.OK, "User Login ID 등록 가능 여부 조회 성공", | ||
| IsLoginIdAvailableResponse.from(isLoginIdAvailable))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The static factory method IsLoginIdAvailableResponse.from() is redundant here as it just wraps the record's constructor. It's clearer and more idiomatic for Java records to use the constructor directly when no special logic is involved in the factory method.
Using the constructor here allows you to remove the from method from the IsLoginIdAvailableResponse record, simplifying the DTO.
| IsLoginIdAvailableResponse.from(isLoginIdAvailable))); | |
| new IsLoginIdAvailableResponse(isLoginIdAvailable))); |
✨ 구현한 기능
📢 논의하고 싶은 내용
🎸 기타
Summary by CodeRabbit