-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 960
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
subframe test; error: link not found in model #3143
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for helping in improving MoveIt and open source robotics! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3143 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.66% 61.55% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 376 376
Lines 33314 33314
==========================================
- Hits 20540 20504 -36
- Misses 12774 12810 +36
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Thanks. I didn't get around to responding to your ROS Answers questions (where you should cross-link these posts). As you can see in the original PR #1439, this was not implemented for |
I was afraid of that @felixvd. As people obviously kind of expect that subframe resolution works everywhere, should we replace the adapter plugin with a corresponding hard-coded call to resolve subframes wherever applicable? |
yes, the adapter was not a good choice for this resolution I guess. 🤔 |
@felixvd Thanks for the clarification. In the meantime, I will see where I can get to with the pilz_industrial_motion_planner |
Attempting to use pilz industrial motion planner gets me a similar error:
Planning using the default tool frame works just fine. |
Hello @rhaschke , just wondering if there's any update on this? I'm also trying to accomplish the same thing -- computeCartesianPath for a subframe by multiple waypoints. As of the latest code, it won't allow me to do so because subframe (of an attached object) is not part of the robot. Is there any open PR that enables computeCartesianPath to resolve subframes, or should I switch to using pilz_industrial_motion_planner? Thanks |
Reply to self: Using pilz industrial motion planner, I have implemented a way to resolve a series of waypoints for any subframe. The amount of engineering work needed in implementing this is a bit more than I expected, but it's been a good learning experience to me nevertheless. |
e1b0ec1
to
fdc3b1c
Compare
Description
See #3139. This contains a new subframe test that looks at planning using move_group.computeCartesianPath. Subframes are not resolving in this planner.
Checklist