You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Legal team has told us that Google Maps uses closed/proprietary data and OpenStreetMaps is an open data alternative.
Mozilla has a general policy preference for using open data projects, so unless there is a compelling business reason why OSM will not work for our project, we should go with that.
Legal team asks if we can take a look at OSM and let them know our thoughts...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On 27 Jan 2017 15:03, "Maria Angeles Oteo" ***@***.***> wrote:
Legal team has told us that Google Maps uses closed/proprietary data and
OpenStreetMaps is an open data alternative.
Mozilla has a general policy preference for using open data projects, so
unless there is a compelling business reason why OSM will not work for our
project, we should go with that.
Legal team asks if we can take a look at OSM and let them know our
thoughts...
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAzSjlKstSubXnV2GkJ-031SDQOBeQJFks5rWgdAgaJpZM4Lv23l>
.
I suggest we backlog this until post pilot. We're launching a prototype to a very small audience. I'm sure legal have much bigger concerns with our project aside from the chosen mapping solution including some closed proprietary code. Let's try not to get hung-up on small details at this stage :)
Legal team has told us that Google Maps uses closed/proprietary data and OpenStreetMaps is an open data alternative.
Mozilla has a general policy preference for using open data projects, so unless there is a compelling business reason why OSM will not work for our project, we should go with that.
Legal team asks if we can take a look at OSM and let them know our thoughts...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: