Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Convert ad-hoc state machine to futures state machine lib #1181

Closed
bbangert opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Convert ad-hoc state machine to futures state machine lib #1181

bbangert opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@pjenvey @bbangert
Labels
bug p1
Milestone
PUSHSVC-0: quality

Comments

@bbangert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bbangert bbangert added this to the PUSHSVC-0: quality milestone Apr 18, 2018
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
7f2e232 
Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
@bbangert bbangert mentioned this issue Apr 20, 2018
Merged
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
f664875 
Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
0c5eb73 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@mozilla.com>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
ebe5136 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@mozilla.com>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
6426ad8 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@mozilla.com>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
976cc60 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
5cf5a41 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
bbangert added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2018
@bbangert
feat: refactor client state machine
8649637 
Co-authored-by: Phil Jenvey <pjenvey@underboss.org>

Switch to using the futures state machine to separate out client
state from the implementation.

Closes #1181
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@pjenvey pjenvey

@bbangert bbangert

Labels
bug p1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
PUSHSVC-0: quality
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pjenvey @bbangert