Does the validator need to be localized?

[muffinresearch]

I see the current validator isn't - but I wondered if that might make sense.

[tofumatt]

Need is probably a strong word, but no reason not to build it with that it mind. I don't mind going through all the strings and wrapping them in gettext or whatnot.

• tofumatt (Sent from mobile)

On 1 Oct 2015, 21:27 +0100, Stuart Colvillenotifications@github.com, wrote:

I see the current tool isn't - but I wondered if that might make sense.

—
Reply to this email directly orview it on GitHub(#40).

[muffinresearch]

I've not seen / heard a requirement for this but in terms of improving the add-on ecosystem it seems like it would be nice if the tool was localized both when used from the web and as a cli tool.

[tofumatt]

It should be minimal effort to do, so let's add it to the next sprint. I'll take it on then.

[tofumatt]

NOTE: Explore es6 gettext/translating template string.

[muffinresearch]

Going to raise a new issue for the last point re: tags and templating for l10n in es6. Otherwise we have consensus that we'll at a minimum wrap strings in gettext as we go.