Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1732293 More processing of namespace and doctype #2388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jklukas
Copy link
Contributor

@jklukas jklukas commented Sep 29, 2021

Follow-up to #2387

Checklist for reviewer:

  • Commits should reference a bug or github issue, if relevant (if a bug is referenced, the pull request should include the bug number in the title)
  • If the PR comes from a fork, trigger integration CI tests by running the Push to upstream workflow and provide the <username>:<branch> of the fork as parameter. The parameter will also show up
    in the logs of the manual-trigger-required-for-fork CI task together with more detailed instructions.
  • If adding a new field to a query, ensure that the schema and dependent downstream schemas have been updated

@jklukas jklukas requested a review from whd September 29, 2021 13:17
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
submission_date
"""

EXCLUDED_NAMESPACES = {"xfocsp_error_report"} # restricted access
# Restricted access
EXCLUDED_NAMESPACES = {"regrets_reporter", "contextual_services"}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did local testing this time to make sure all the remaining issues were worked out. Because my personal account doesn't have access to these two namespaces, I got errors there. I think it's good to include these exemptions to keep this script runnable by data eng accounts.

@jklukas jklukas enabled auto-merge (squash) September 29, 2021 17:44
@jklukas jklukas merged commit 19decdb into main Sep 29, 2021
@jklukas jklukas deleted the docids_fix branch September 29, 2021 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants