Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Add oauth_webchannel_v1 for Fenix and GeckoView apps #2043
[WIP] Add oauth_webchannel_v1 for Fenix and GeckoView apps #2043
Changes from 6 commits
6a8d332
cfffb41
fad6085
50d5323
824e9e3
a3d512d
ce45434
5a72f49
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious why this change was necessary, is it a limitation of the webextension webchannel receiver?
I'd also be tempted to do a
typeof event.details
here to ensure you don't try toJSON.parse
something that's not a string.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did the API of the WebChannel message change with Fenix/GeckoView?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WebExtensions in Geckoview/ Fenix cannot pass js objects, only strings. Otherwise it displays
[protected]
,[inaccessible]
or somethingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hrm, I also recall an ancient bug about sending only strings on Desktop as well, which has had to get added to a special allowlist in order to bypass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's when sending an event to the browser that detail has to be stringified: