You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expected results:
I should see the most relevant results first. In this case this would be "gc_max_pause_ms_2". Active probes should be ranked higher than inactive probes, and ideally the search result list should be annotated with "active" / "inactive".
Actual results:
At the moment, number 1 is "cycle_collector_max_pause", and number 2 is "gc_max_pause_ms".
"cycle_collector_max_pause" is somewhat related, but CC is strictly speaking not GC.
More importantly, "gc_max_pause_ms" is an inactive probe and doesn't show any data.
Its replacement, "gc_max_pause_ms_2", is at the bottom of the list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The same happens if you search for "delay". The first five results (which take up 75% of the search result screen estate) are all inactive probes without data.
I was using the search field in GLAM to find probes about GC pause times, and one of the top results showed me an inactive probe without any data.
Steps to reproduce:
Expected results:
I should see the most relevant results first. In this case this would be "gc_max_pause_ms_2". Active probes should be ranked higher than inactive probes, and ideally the search result list should be annotated with "active" / "inactive".
Actual results:
At the moment, number 1 is "cycle_collector_max_pause", and number 2 is "gc_max_pause_ms".
"cycle_collector_max_pause" is somewhat related, but CC is strictly speaking not GC.
More importantly, "gc_max_pause_ms" is an inactive probe and doesn't show any data.
Its replacement, "gc_max_pause_ms_2", is at the bottom of the list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: