-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1827852 - Extend start/stop time of a ping to millisecond precision #2456
Conversation
8e16a02
to
d03bb10
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget to update the docs to indicate the new precision.
d03bb10
to
c83d3cd
Compare
c83d3cd
to
8bc7031
Compare
9cf3397
to
0f8775f
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2456 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 33.33% 33.33%
=======================================
Files 1 1
Lines 42 42
=======================================
Hits 14 14
Misses 28 28
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
0f8775f
to
5c66891
Compare
Uh oh! Looks like an error! DetailsTaskcluster-GitHub attempted to cancel previously created task groups with following scopes:
Client ID static/taskcluster/github does not have sufficient scopes and is missing the following scopes:
This request requires the client to satisfy the following scope expression:
|
5c66891
to
61c73ad
Compare
Uh oh! Looks like an error! DetailsTaskcluster-GitHub attempted to cancel previously created task groups with following scopes:
Client ID static/taskcluster/github does not have sufficient scopes and is missing the following scopes:
This request requires the client to satisfy the following scope expression:
|
61c73ad
to
d1e3345
Compare
Uh oh! Looks like an error! DetailsTaskcluster-GitHub attempted to cancel previously created task groups with following scopes:
Client ID static/taskcluster/github does not have sufficient scopes and is missing the following scopes:
This request requires the client to satisfy the following scope expression:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ In addition to those built-in metrics, the following metrics are added to the pi | |||
|
|||
| Name | Type | Description | Data reviews | Extras | Expiration | [Data Sensitivity](https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection) | | |||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | |||
| glean.client.annotation.experimentation_id |[string](https://mozilla.github.io/glean/book/user/metrics/string.html) |An experimentation identifier derived and provided by the application for the purpose of experimentation enrollment. |[Bug 1848201](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1848201#c5)||never |1 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 Don't we recommend folks use the Glean Dictionary for this stuff? (Non-blocking, just thinking out loud about filing a bug)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, we do. for others. We still have it and whether we should or not should go into a separate bug.
@@ -498,8 +500,6 @@ glean.error: | |||
Only sent if the buffer ever overflows. | |||
|
|||
In Version 0 this reported the total number of tasks enqueued. | |||
unit: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
o_O. Where did this come from? Ahh, cool! Even though unit
has not meaning here, it still shows up in the Glean dictionary. Maybe this would be okay to leave as I kinda like the explicit documentation this metadata provides (though the description should do that, too) 🤔
No strong opinions on this, happy either way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was equally surprised!
We just disallowed this in glean_parser. So we would need to retract that decision, which would require a bug, a revert and a new release.
Requires mozilla/glean_parser#592