Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sort builtin filters alphabetically in docs #858

Closed
JesseE opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 0 comments · Fixed by #863
Closed

Sort builtin filters alphabetically in docs #858

JesseE opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 0 comments · Fixed by #863

Comments

@JesseE
Copy link
Contributor

JesseE commented Sep 16, 2016

Currently the builtin filters are unordered. This makes them hard to find. Ordering them alphabetically would fix this.

I assign myself to this task

@jbmoelker jbmoelker changed the title order of builtin filters in template documentation not in alphabetical order Sort builtin filters alphabetically in docs Sep 16, 2016
jbmoelker pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2016
Ordered filters alphabetically in English and French documentation.
Chinese docs only have references to Jinja docs, so are not updated.

Closes #858
JesseE pushed a commit to JesseE/nunjucks that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2016
add dump filter documentation

added changelog update

Fix mobile viewport (meta) (mozilla#865)

closes mozilla#860

Order builtin filters alphabetically (mozilla#863)

Ordered filters alphabetically in English and French documentation.
Chinese docs only have references to Jinja docs, so are not updated.

Closes mozilla#858

added more elaborate tests and adding variants of values that can be passed in json

remove single quotes and added spaces here and there

change foo dump to items dump consistency

change key types

correcting documentation dump filter

perfecting dump documentation

perfecting dump testing

added different indentation

complete tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants